Search Results for "unauthorized development"

397 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 397 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Owner's Impleadment in Tenant's Suit Challenging Municipal Notice Under Section 354A of MMC Act, 1888 — Owner Held Necessary Party as Decision Directly Affects Property Interest.

The petitioner, M/s Mulraj Khatau and Sons Ltd., the owner of a suit property, filed a Chamber Summons under Order I Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Proc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Additional Development Charges Demand by Nagpur Improvement Trust on Transferee of Regularized Plot. NIT Lacks Competency to Impose Additional Charges After Regularization Under Maharashtra Gunthewari Act, 2001.

The petitioner, Pramod Ganpatrao Pinge, challenged a demand notice issued by the Nagpur Improvement Trust (NIT) calling upon him to pay additional reg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging TDR Loading and FSI Computation for Redevelopment Project. Court upholds MCGM's permission for TDR and fungible FSI, finding no illegality or public interest violation.

The petitioner, Nitesh Mohanlal Doshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the permission gr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Municipal Corporation's Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Structure. Notice under Section 351 of the Municipal Corporation Act for covering open space with shed held valid as plaintiff failed to prove long-standing existence or authorization.

The appellant, Mohammed Kasam, filed a suit in the Bombay City Civil Court seeking a declaration that a notice dated 15.11.1997 issued by the Municipa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Notice Under Section 89 of MRTP Act for Lack of Jurisdiction — Prior Civil Court Decree Declaring Petitioner as Lessee and Not Trespasser Bars Corporation from Issuing Notice Under Different Act

The petitioner, M/s. Iqbal & Brothers, a partnership firm, challenged a notice dated 2nd December 1997 issued by the Pune Municipal Corporation under ...