Search Results for "ticket evidence"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "ticket evidence"

384 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 384 result(s)

High Court

High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Claims Case and Remands for Relationship Proof Determination. Identity card number matching between identity card and monthly season ticket establishes passenger identity despite name discrepancy under Railways Act, 1989, and Tribunal must properly consider all documentary evidence for relationship proof.

10 Mar 2026

The appeal arose from an order of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Mumbai dated 5th September 2014, which rejected compensation claims filed by the origin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Case — Deemed Death as Untoward Incident Under Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987. Mother of Deceased Entitled to Compensation as Bona Fide Passenger Despite Absence of Ticket.

27 Sep 2023

The case involves an appeal filed by the mother of the deceased, Arju Bharat Shende, against the dismissal of her claim for compensation by the Railwa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Railway's Appeal Against Compensation Award for Passenger's Fall from Train. Fall from Running Train Due to Jerk or Push Constitutes Untoward Incident Under Section 123(c)(2) of Railways Act, 1989, and Railway is Liable Under Section 124A.

25 Sep 2023

The appeal was filed by the Union of India, represented by the General Manager, Central Railway, challenging the judgment and order dated 8.10.2009 of...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Railway Compensation for Passenger Injured While Deboarding Wrong Train — Negligence Not a Bar Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989. The court held that an accidental fall from a train while attempting to deboard a moving train constitutes an 'untoward incident' under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, and the Railway is strictly liable for compensation regardless of the passenger's negligence.

11 Nov 2022

The case involves two appeals filed by the Union of India, through the General Manager, Central Railway, challenging the decision of the Railway Claim...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation to Deceased Passenger's Family in Railway Accident Case — Deceased Was a Bonafide Passenger While Alighting and Walking on Track Due to Lack of Foot Overbridge. The Court held that the deceased remained a bonafide passenger and the incident was an untoward incident under Section 123(c)(2) of the Railways Act, 1989, entitling the claimants to compensation under Section 124-A.

10 Oct 2022

The appellants, being the widow, son, and mother of the deceased Manohar Gajbhiye, filed a claim under the Railways Act, 1989 before the Railway Claim...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Dependants of Deceased Passenger in Railway Accident Case — Holds That Deceased Was a Bonafide Passenger and Death Was an Untoward Incident Under Railways Act, 1989. The court awarded compensation of Rs. 8,00,000/- with interest at 6% per annum from the date of claim application till realization.

26 Aug 2022

The present appeal was filed by the dependants of the deceased Sandesh Kale, who died in a railway accident on 20/09/2012. The appellants, being the w...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Deceased Was a Bona Fide Passenger. Burden of Proof on Railways to Show Negligence or Criminal Act Not Discharged Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989.

6 Jul 2018

The appellants, wife, son, and married daughter of Thippareddy, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Bangalore, seeking compensation for ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Railway Appeal in Passenger Death Case — Untoward Incident Under Section 124A Railways Act, 1989 Established. Sudden Jerk While Alighting from Train Constitutes an Untoward Incident, and Railway's Denial of Ticket Validity Not Sustained.

18 Jul 2013

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India, represented by the General Manager of South Central Railway, against a judgment of the Recovery Cla...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Conviction of Accused for Murder, Abduction, Robbery and Destruction of Evidence Based on Circumstantial Evidence. The court held that the chain of circumstances including last seen together, motive, recovery of stolen ornaments, and conduct of the accused was complete and pointed only to the guilt of the accused under Sections 364, 302, 392 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

1 Jul 2013

The appellant, Mahanand Naik, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, North Goa, Panaji in Sessions Case No. 44/2009 for offences under Sections 364, 302...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed Deceased a Bona Fide Passenger Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Parents of 18-year-old who fell from train entitled to compensation under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 despite absence of ticket.

22 Feb 2005

The appellants, parents of deceased Prasad Narshima Purohit, filed a claim petition before the Railway Claims Tribunal seeking compensation of Rs.4,00...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)