Search Results for "testamentary disposition"

123 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 123 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Land Transfer Case Due to Violation of Section 29(3)(a) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. Will Executed Without Prior Permission of Competent Authority for Class-II Occupancy Land Held Invalid.

The case involves a second appeal by the original defendant, Sakharam Shrawan Bhise, against the judgment of the lower appellate court which confirmed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Marking of Will in Testamentary Suit Despite Disputed Execution. Court holds that attesting witness's affidavit and oral evidence sufficiently prove due execution under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The matter pertains to Testamentary Suit No. 46 of 1997 arising out of Testamentary Petition No. 308 of 1997 concerning the estate of Raju Muthaya She...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Motion to Strike Out Caveat Filed by Person Claiming Adverse Title in Probate Proceedings. Caveator Without Caveatable Interest Cannot Maintain Caveat Under Section 283 of Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The petitioner, Ashokkumar Krishnakumar Shukla, as sole executor named in the last Will and testament of Krishnakumar, filed a probate petition in the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Grant of Letters of Administration — Will Proved by Attesting Witness Under Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 and Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The Court Held That the Propounder Removed All Suspicious Circumstances and the Will Was Genuine.

The appeal arose from a judgment of a single judge granting Letters of Administration to the respondent, Rakesh Phoolchand Jain, in respect of the las...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Land Dispute Involving Surplus Land and Tenancy Rights. Court upholds Single Judge's order confirming that land was not surplus and appellants were not entitled to restoration of possession under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code and Bombay Tenancy Act.

The case involves three Letters Patent Appeals arising out of writ petitions decided by a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court at Nagpur. The appella...