Search Results for "suspicious recovery"

446 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 446 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Multiple Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Evidence. Convictions under Section 395 IPC set aside as test identification parade was not conducted and recovery of stolen property was not linked to the accused.

The case involves multiple appeals against a common judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, convicting several accused for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witness and Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 364 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of Ananda Ganpati Pawle. The appellants, Shyamsundar Vithal Pawle, Sharad Shyamsundar Pawle, and Madhav Venkat Pawle, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Narhari Suryawanshi, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedpur, for the murder of his nephew Laxman under Section 302 IP...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Husband in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for killing wife by strangulation and setting her on fire, relying on last seen theory, motive, and recovery of incriminating articles.

The appellant, Harish Ramesh Pulekar, was convicted by the I/c Adhoc District Judge-I, Thane in Sessions Case No.382 of 2006 for the murder of his wif...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Death Reference and Appeals Arising from 2000 Church Bomb Blast Case. Accused Allegedly part of Deendar Anjuman, charged with conspiracy under IPC Sections 120-B, 121-A, 124-A, 153-A.

On December 17, 2014, the High Court of Karnataka delivered a common judgment in Criminal RC No. 3/2008, Criminal Appeal No. 1203/2008, and Criminal A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010422252008_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Death Sentence Confirmation and Appeals against Conviction in 2000 Church Bomb Blast. Accused were convicted under Sections 120-B, 121-A, 124-A, 153-A IPC by Trial Court for conspiracy and bomb blast at St. Peter and Paul Church, Bangalore.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard together a criminal reference for confirmation of death sentence and two criminal appeals arising from ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 IPC Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Motive of Eve Teasing and Recovery of Weapon on Disclosure Statement Formed Complete Chain of Circumstances Pointing to Guilt.

The appellant, Manoj Madanlal Tekam, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Ravi Subhash Hulke. The incident occurred on 28.01.1996 whe...