Search Results for "substantial question of law"

977 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 977 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — High Court Erred in Reversing First Appellate Court's Refusal of Possession Without Framing Substantial Question of Law. Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC Cannot Be Entertained Without Formulating a Substantial Question of Law.

The case involves a property dispute between Nazir Mohamed (appellant) and J. Kamala (respondent) over a building and premises in Aduthurai, Tamil Nad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Claiming Private Temple Ownership — Revenue Entries Do Not Confer Title Without Document of Title. The Court held that the plaintiff failed to prove the temple was private and that revenue entries alone cannot establish ownership under Section 100 CPC.

The appellant, Ramesh Das (since deceased, represented by legal representatives), filed a civil suit for declaration and perpetual injunction claiming...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Second Appeal Case - Punjab Courts Act Applies Over CPC. Substantial Question of Law Not Required for Second Appeals in Punjab Under Section 41 of Punjab Courts Act, 1918.

The Supreme Court disposed of a civil appeal arising from a regular second appeal decided by the Punjab and Haryana High Court. The sole contention ra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Partition Suit: High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 100 CPC by Reappreciating Evidence. The Court restored concurrent findings of trial court and first appellate court dismissing suits for partition and injunction.

The Supreme Court considered appeals against a common judgment of the Madras High Court which, in exercise of its second appellate jurisdiction under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Remands Income Tax Appeal to High Court for Non-Compliance with Section 260A(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961. High Court Failed to Frame Substantial Questions of Law as Mandated, Rendering Its Judgment Unsustainable.

The appellant, Ryatar Sahakari Sakkarre Karkhane Niyamit, an assessee under the Income Tax Act, 1961, filed appeals before the Supreme Court against t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Remands Income Tax Appeal to High Court for Non-Compliance with Section 260A Procedure. The High Court failed to frame substantial questions of law as mandated under Section 260A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, leading to procedural irregularity.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the Bombay High Court's order dismissing the Revenue's appeal und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals and Remands Second Appeals to High Court for Fresh Disposal Due to Procedural Non-Compliance Under Section 100 CPC. High Court Dismissed Second Appeals on an Un-Framed Question Without Following Mandatory Procedure Under Section 100(5) CPC.

The appellant, Tanuku Taluk Village Officers' Association, filed two civil suits against Tanuku Municipality and others: one for permanent injunction ...