Search Results for "special statute overriding CrPC"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "special statute overriding CrPC"

61 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 61 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction Under Arms Act and IPC in 1993 Bombay Serial Blasts Case. Appellants Challenged Conviction for Possession of Prohibited Arms Without License and Destruction of Evidence.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court heard appeals against the conviction and sentence of Sanjay Dutt (A-117), Yusuf Mohsin Nulwalla (A-118), and Kersi Bapuji Adajania (...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Third Parties Against Quashing of FIR in POCSO Case — Locus Standi Recognized for Public-Spirited Persons to Challenge Compromise-Based Quashment of Heinous Offences Involving Moral Turpitude and Societal Impact. The Court held that quashing of FIR under Section 482 CrPC based on compromise is impermissible for offences under POCSO Act and SC/ST Act as they are not private in nature and have serious societal impact.

8 Nov 2024

The case arises from FIR No.6/2022 registered on 08.01.2022 at Sardar Gangapur City Police Station, Rajasthan, based on a complaint by the father of a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Prior Approval Under MCOC Act Against Mother of Accused for Lack of Continuing Unlawful Activity — Pre-Arrest Bail Granted Despite Section 21(3) Embargo. The court held that a single act of purchasing a car after the crime does not constitute 'continuing unlawful activity' under Section 2(1)(d) of MCOC Act, and Section 21(3) does not bar constitutional remedy under Article 226.

28 Jun 2024

The petitioner, a woman, challenged the prior approval granted under Section 23(1)(a) of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (MCOC Ac...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Wildlife Offence Case Based on Confessional Statements and Recoveries. Confessional statements made to forest officers under Section 50 of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 are admissible and sufficient for conviction when corroborated by recovery of wild animal meat and weapons.

5 Oct 2023

The case pertains to a criminal revision application filed by five accused (Nos. 8, 9, 10, 11, and 13) challenging their conviction and sentence under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Wildlife Offence Case — Confessional Statements and Seizures Held Admissible Under Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972. The court dismissed the revision application challenging the conviction under Sections 9, 27, 29, 31 read with Section 51(1) of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 for hunting Chitals in Nagzira Forest.

5 Oct 2023

The judgment arises from a criminal revision application filed by five accused (original accused Nos. 8, 9, 10, 11, and 13) challenging their convicti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Illegal Teakwood Transport Under Indian Forest Act, 1927 — Revision Dismissed for Lack of Evidence of Ownership or Innocent Possession. The court held that the burden under Section 69 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 shifts to the accused once possession of forest produce is established, and the applicant failed to rebut the presumption that the teakwood was government property.

5 Oct 2023

The case pertains to a criminal revision application filed by Shrikrishna Rambhau Orivkar, who was convicted by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Akola, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Illegal Teakwood Transport Under Indian Forest Act, 1927 — Revision Dismissed Due to Lack of Evidence of Ownership or Authorization. The court held that the burden of proof under Section 42 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 shifts to the accused once possession of timber is established, and the applicant failed to prove lawful possession.

5 Oct 2023

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Shrikrishna Rambhau Orivkar, who was convicted by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Akola, on ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Refers Conflict on Emergency Parole for POCSO Convicts to Larger Bench. Interpretation of Rule 19(1)(C) of Maharashtra Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959 Requires Resolution of Conflicting Decisions on Entitlement of Convicts Under Section 376 IPC and POCSO Act.

6 Nov 2020

The petitioner, Pintu Uttam Sonale, a convict under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3, 4, and 5 of the Protection of Children from S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Challenge to SEBI Special Court's Rejection of Compounding Application Under Section 24A of SEBI Act. Writ Petition Filed Against Order Denying Compounding of Offence Under Section 24(2) for Non-Payment of Penalty Without SEBI Consent.

30 Oct 2018

The case involved a criminal writ petition filed by N.H. Securities Ltd. and its directors seeking to quash an order of the SEBI Special Court that ha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Quash Discharge Order in Custodial Murder Case — Locus Standi of Third Party Not Established. Applicant, a social activist, lacked standing to challenge discharge of accused in Sohrabuddin Shaikh encounter case as he was not an aggrieved party under Section 482 CrPC.

11 Mar 2016

The applicant, Harsh Mander, a social activist, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking to quash...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)