Search Results for "special limitation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "special limitation"

3451 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3451 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Application by Merchant Vessel Owner to Limit Liability Under Part XA of Merchant Shipping Act Following Collision with Indian Navy Vessel. The Court Examined Whether the Right to Limit Liability is Absolute and Whether the Owner’s Alleged Negligence or Recklessness Could Defeat the Limitation.

17 Feb 2023

The present proceedings arose out of a collision on 30 January 2011 between the merchant vessel M.V.Nordlake, owned by the German-incorporated Plainti...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Testamentary Suit Limitation Dispute — Order of Single Judge Dismissing Suit as Barred by Limitation Set Aside. Court Holds That Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963 Applies to Testamentary Suits and Limitation Runs from Date of Knowledge of Will, Not from Date of Death of Testator.

12 Dec 2024

The appellant, Sri Nanjavudootha Swamiji, the Peethadhipathi of Gurugunda Bramheshwara Swamy Mutt, filed a Testamentary Original Suit No.1/2023 seekin...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Civil Suit on Limitation Grounds, Setting Aside Plaint Rejection. Suit for Declaration of Sale Deed as Void Not Barred by Limitation as Fraud Allegations Under Section 17 of Limitation Act, 1963 Require Factual Inquiry, Making Preliminary Issue Determination Improper Under Order VII Rule 11(d) and Order XIV Rule 2 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

28 Mar 2022

The dispute originated from a civil suit filed by the plaintiff seeking multiple declarations regarding property rights. The plaintiff claimed that a ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Execution Petition in Land Acquisition Case — Limitation Runs from Date of Decree, Not Award. The court held that under Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963, the 12-year limitation period for execution of a decree runs from the date of the decree (dismissal of appeal on 21.06.1991), not from the date of the award (31.07.1985), and thus the execution petition filed on 29.07.2005 was within time.

19 Jun 2013

The case involves a Civil Revision Petition filed by the decree holders (petitioners) against an order dated 18.03.2011 passed by the II Additional Ci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Rectification Application by Applying Principles of Section 14 of Limitation Act to Section 35C(2) of Central Excise Act. Principles of Section 14 of Limitation Act, 1963 are applicable to rectification applications under Section 35C(2) of Central Excise Act, 1944, even though no express power to condone delay exists.

5 Oct 2017

The petitioners, IVP Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 6 March 2009...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Condonation of Delay in MPID Act Case — Designated Court Has No Power to Condon Delay Beyond 90 Days Under Section 5(3) of MPID Act. Limitation Period for Filing Application Under Section 5(3) is 90 Days, Delay Cannot Be Condoned Beyond That Period as MPID Act is a Complete Code.

17 Feb 2020

The appellants, Mr. Nimish s/o Satish Deopujari, Mr. Satish s/o Shankarrao Deopujari, and Sau. Vandana w/o Satish Deopujari, filed an Appeal Against O...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Delay Case — Section 14 of Limitation Act Applicable to Section 34 Applications. Supreme Court Precedent in Consolidated Engineering Enterprises v. Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department Held Binding, District Judge's Order Condoning Delay Restored.

20 Aug 2013

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by the Defence Estate Officer against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court....

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Execution of Decree by Excluding Time Spent in Wrong Forum Under Section 14 of Limitation Act — Bona Fide Prosecution Before Tehsildar Entitled to Exclusion. The Court held that the period spent in pursuing an execution application before a court lacking jurisdiction can be excluded under Section 14(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963, if the proceedings were conducted with due diligence and good faith.

17 Apr 2024

The present appeal arises from a decree for possession passed in 1986 in favor of the plaintiff (predecessor-in-interest of the appellants) against th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Suit Based on Adverse Possession — Overrules Earlier View That Adverse Possession Can Only Be Used as Shield. Plaintiff Who Has Perfected Title by Adverse Possession Can Sue for Declaration and Protection or Recovery of Possession.

7 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court addressed the question whether a person claiming title by adverse possession can maintain a suit for declaration of title and for pr...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Condonation of Delay in Filing Revision under Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, Holding Section 5 of Limitation Act Applies. The Court ruled that a revision under Section 201-B is a 'petition' covered by Section 239-B, which expressly incorporates Sections 4, 5, 12, and 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and no provision excludes condonation of delay.

7 Aug 2017

The dispute arose from a demolition order issued by the Village Panchayat of Queula against the petitioner for alleged illegal construction, based on ...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)