Bombay High Court on Slum Evictions: Contractual Disputes to Be Raised Separately
19 Jan 2026The Petitioner filed a writ petition challenging eviction orders passed by the Slum Rehabilitation Authority and the Apex Grievance Redressal Committe...
Search Results for "slum rehabilitation authority"
281 result(s) found
Found 281 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging AGRC Order — Restores Termination of Developer for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Consents and No-Objection Certificate. Failure to Obtain Consent of 70% Municipal Tenants and Annexure-II from MCGM Justifies Termination Under Section 13(2) of Maharashtra Slums Areas Act, 1971.
10 Jun 2024The Bombay High Court allowed a writ petition challenging the order of the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee (AGRC) which had set aside the terminati...
- 580
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Group of Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Slum Land Acquisition Provisions. The Petitioners, Owners of Lands Declared as Slum Areas, Challenge the Acquisition Notices Issued Under Section 14 and the Method of Compensation Under Section 17 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971.
10 May 2013In Mumbai, where more than half the population lives in slums, the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 was ena...
- 16
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Inclusion in Slum Rehabilitation List Due to Lack of Electoral Roll Evidence. Petitioner failed to prove residence as of 1.1.1995, a requirement under the Slum Rehabilitation Scheme.
19 Mar 2013The petitioner, Indu Ramchandra Khanvilkar, claimed to have a hut on survey no.162/162-2/1 to 7, 165/1 to 84 at Village Malad, Taluka Borivli, which w...
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SRA Order in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute — Petitioner Failed to Establish Entitlement to Alternate Accommodation Under SRA Scheme.
12 Dec 2025The petitioner, Samir Narain Bhojwani, filed a writ petition challenging an order passed by the Assistant Registrar, C.S. (Eastern & Western Suburban)...
- 99
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Demolition of Structures Under MHADA Act — Held That Occupants in Possession Prior to Cut-Off Date Are Entitled to Rehabilitation and Cannot Be Evicted Without Following Due Process Under Section 33 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Re-development) Act, 1971.
19 Jul 2022The judgment pertains to a group of writ petitions filed by occupants of structures in slum areas in Mumbai, challenging the demolition of their dwell...
- 114
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Eviction Notices under Slum Act in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute. Petitioners Challenged Eviction Notices Issued under Sections 33 and 38 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, Alleging Lack of Section 3C(1) Declaration.
26 Apr 2006The matter arose from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by Om-Sai Darshan Cooperative Housing Society (Proposed) an...
- 24
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Apex Grievance Redressal Committee Order in Slum Rehabilitation Case. AGRC's Reversal of Developer Termination Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Natural Justice.
29 Apr 2021The petitioner, Hanuman Nagar (Jogeshwari) SRA CHS (Proposed), is a society of slum dwellers residing on a plot in Jogeshwari, Mumbai. In 2006, the ma...
- 81
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Slum Rehabilitation Authority Against Interim Orders Directing Acceptance of Rehabilitation Proposals. Court upholds trial court's discretion to grant interim relief pending suit, finding no jurisdictional error or perversity in the impugned orders.
13 Sep 2013The Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) and another defendant filed multiple appeals challenging interim orders passed by the City Civil Court, Bombay...
- 89
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute, Holding Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Entertain Suit for Declaration of Rights Under Development Agreement. The Court set aside the order returning plaint, ruling that the Slum Rehabilitation Authority's jurisdiction is limited to statutory functions and does not oust civil court's jurisdiction to adjudicate contractual disputes.
27 Jul 2010The plaintiff, Bholanath Ramjas Yadav, filed a suit in the City Civil Court, Bombay, seeking a declaration that he is entitled to the benefits of a De...
- 62
