Search Results for "signed cheque"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "signed cheque"

593 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 593 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Handwriting Expert Not Required When Signature Admitted Under Section 20 of NI Act. The court held that under Section 20 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, the payee is authorized to fill up the cheque, making expert opinion on handwriting unnecessary when the drawer admits his signature.

2 Dec 2025

The petitioner/complainant filed a criminal writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 18-06-2025 passed by the learned Additional Session...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused. The court held that the complainant proved the existence of a legally enforceable debt and the accused failed to rebut the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

20 Sep 2023

The complainant, Chidamber S. Nanavate, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(1) and (4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in NI Act Case: Director Can Be Prosecuted Without Company Being Arraigned as Accused if Complaint Contains Requisite Averments Under Section 141. The Court held that the absence of the company as an accused is not fatal and lack of specific averments can be cured, restoring the summoning order against the director.

9 Dec 2022

The Supreme Court considered appeals against the High Court of Allahabad's judgment quashing criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in NI Act Case — Conviction for Dishonour of Cheque When Debt is Less Than Cheque Amount. The court held that the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 applies to the existence of a legally enforceable debt, and the accused must rebut it; mere discrepancy in amount does not vitiate the complaint if the debt is proved.

3 Feb 2021

The appellant, M. Ramesh Kumar, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent, Riyaz Ur Rehaman, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act for Dishonour of Cheque Issued as Consideration for Sale Deed. Defence of Security Cheque Rejected as Accused Failed to Rebut Presumption Under Section 139.

16 Aug 2019

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Rajendra Mahadeorao Chaudhary (applicant/original accused) challenging his conviction under...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses High Court Conviction Due to Insufficient Rebuttal of Presumption. The Court held that the accused successfully raised a probable defence by questioning the complainant's financial capacity and the circumstances of the loan, thereby rebutting the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

27 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by the accused against the High Court of Karnataka's judgment convicting him under Section 138 of the Negotiabl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Bank Accountant in Corruption and Forgery Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 and IPC Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Misappropriation Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

30 Oct 2018

The appellant, Ramakant Devidas Solkke, was an accountant at the State Bank of India, Main Branch, Akola. On 30 April 1986, Bharat Petroleum Corporati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Accused in Section 138 NI Act Case — Cheque Not Drawn on Accused's Account. Applicant cannot be held vicariously liable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as the cheque was drawn on the account of a proprietorship firm, not on the personal account of the accused.

12 Feb 2016

The applicant, Dr. (Mrs) Rajul Ketan Raj, was accused no.1 in three complaints filed by Reliance Capital Ltd. under Section 138 of the Negotiable Inst...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Acquittal Set Aside Due to Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Dishonour of Cheque for Rs.35,000/- on Ground of 'Account Closed' Attracts Section 138 NI Act; Accused's Defence of Loan Repayment Not Proved.

24 Nov 2011

The appellant, Vithal @ Vithoba Gorakh Shinde, was the original complainant in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Stop Payment Instruction Constitutes Offence Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court held that the drawer who stops payment of a cheque cannot escape liability if the cheque is dishonoured, and the presumption of a legally enforceable debt under Section 139 NI Act was not rebutted.

31 Aug 2006

The appellant, M/s P. V. Constructions, through its proprietor S. Venugopalan, filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of the respondent, K. J. ...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)