Search Results for "semen"

315 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 315 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Considers Whether Evidence Proves Attempt to Rape or Outraging Modesty in Case Involving Mentally Retarded Victim

This criminal appeal challenged the judgment and order dated 27/01/2017 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar in Sessions Case No.219 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to DNA Evidence Inconsistency and Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f)(l) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act set aside as DNA report excluded semen and blood of accused, and victim's testimony was tutored.

The appellant, Bhaiyya S/o Vijay Chakre, was convicted by the Special Judge, Achalpur, for offences under Section 376(2)(f)(l) of the Indian Penal Cod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor Under POCSO Act and IPC — Medical Evidence and Victim's Testimony Sufficient. Child Victim's Consistent Testimony and Medical Report of Tear in Hymen Establish Offence Under Section 376(1) IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of POCSO Act.

The appellant, Nana @ Dnyneshwar Yerme, was convicted by the Special Judge under the POCSO Act and IPC for kidnapping and raping a four-year-old girl....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Medical Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Witnesses Contradicted Each Other on Date of Incident and Medical Report Did Not Support Rape.

The appellant, Chandya Shravan Naik, was convicted by the Trial Court for an offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Mentally Ill 60-Year-Old Woman Under Section 376 IPC. Evidence of Incapacitated Victim and DNA Report Sufficient to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ajmat Shaha @ Ajju Tayyab Shaha, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akot, District Akola, for the offence punishable under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Acid Attack Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376 and 326 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Forcible Sexual Intercourse and Pouring of Acid Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Sadashio s/o Rengo Kotangale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhandara, in Sessions Trial 82 of 2012 for offences punis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Not Supporting Rape.

The appellant, Niranjan s/o Vishnu Chavan, was convicted by the 2nd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Pusad, for an offence punishable under Section 37...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(1) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Prabhu @ Prabhakar Abaji Khkedekar, was convicted by the 1st Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli, on 29.3.2005 in Sessions Case...