Search Results for "selection grade pay"

256 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 256 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeal of Territorial Army Officer for Reconsideration of Promotion Grading. COAS directed to reconsider appellant's 'Z' grading in June 2001 Selection Board, as similar reconsideration was granted to another officer.

The appellant, Lt. Col. NK Ghai (Retd.), was commissioned into the Territorial Army on 14 March 1978 and promoted to Selection Grade Lieutenant Colone...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Direct Recruit District Judge's Claim for Seniority Over Promotees in Kerala Higher Judicial Service. Notional Seniority Granted from Date of Initial Appointment of Other Direct Recruits in Same Selection.

The case involves a dispute over seniority between direct recruit District Judges and promotees appointed by transfer in the Kerala Higher Judicial Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds CAT Order in Railway Promotion Dispute — Criteria for Assessment of Candidates for PHOD Post Held Arbitrary. The Court directed review DPC for notional promotion from date juniors were promoted with consequential benefits.

The Union of India and another (petitioners) challenged the judgment and order dated 23rd January 2001 of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Appointment of Traffic Manager in Mormugao Port Trust — Petitioner Failed to Establish Eligibility Criteria Violation. Selection Committee's Assessment of Experience and Grading Found to Be Within Bounds of Recruitment Rules.

The petitioner, a Senior Traffic Manager at Mormugao Port Trust, challenged the appointment of respondent no.3 as Traffic Manager (HOD) by letter date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Industrial Tribunal Award Directing Regularization of 24 Workmen in National Aerospace Laboratories — Workmen Held Not Entitled to Regularization as They Were Employed by Contractor, Not Principal Employer.

The petitioner, Management of National Aerospace Laboratories (NAL), challenged the award dated 30-12-2005 of the Industrial Tribunal, Bengaluru in I....