Search Results for "security deposit refund"

309 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 309 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in MPID Act Deposit Dispute — High Court Erred in Treating Investment as Loan Transaction. The court held that amounts advanced with promise of interest constitute 'deposit' under Section 2(c) of MPID Act, and failure to repay amounts to 'fraudulent default' under Section 3.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Bombay High Court dismissing the appellants' Criminal Revision Application under the MPID Act. The ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal of BEST Undertaking Against Liquidator's Rejection of Interest Claim and Secured Creditor Status in Liquidation of Spark Green Energy. Interest-Free Deposit Does Not Attract Interest, and Unregistered Charge Does Not Confer Secured Status Under IBC.

The appeal was filed by Brihanmumbai Electricity Supply and Transport Undertaking (BEST) against an order of the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT Mumbai B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in SARFAESI Auction Dispute — Extension of Time Not Binding Without Confirmation Letter. Forfeiture of Earnest Money Upheld Under Rule 9(5) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State Bank of India (the Bank) against the judgment of the Madras High Court. The dispute arose from...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Business Centre Agreement Dispute. Termination of Agreement Due to Economic Crisis Held Valid; Refund of Security Deposit Upheld.

The appellant, M/s. Pankaj Dyes & Chemicals Ltd., entered into a Business Centre Agreement with the respondent, M/s. Taco Hendrickson Suspensions Pvt ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement of Sale Not Proved Due to Absence of Attesting Witness and Discrepancies in Evidence. Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Execution of Agreement and Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The case involves two first appeals arising from suits for specific performance of agreements of sale dated 11.4.2002. The respondents (plaintiffs) cl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Stamp Duty Demand on Collateral Security Bond. Security-cum-Mortgage Bond executed as collateral security for loan is chargeable under Article 40(c) of Schedule I of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958, not as mortgage deed.

The petitioner, M/s. Jaika Automobiles Private Limited, a private limited company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitutio...