Search Results for "securities market"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "securities market"

225 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 225 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Award Found to Be in Conflict with Public Policy and Patent Illegality. The Court held that the Arbitral Tribunal's interpretation of the contract was perverse and ignored the express terms, leading to a miscarriage of justice.

9 Jun 2026

The dispute arose out of a contract between ABB India Limited (Petitioner) and Sunil Hariram Jaisingh and Others (Respondents) for the supply and inst...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Money Decree in Summary Suit for Dishonour of Cheque — Held That Plaintiff Failed to Prove Debt and That Cheque Was Not Issued for Discharge of Existing Liability. The Court set aside the decree as the suit was based on a time-barred debt and the plaintiff failed to establish consideration.

27 Oct 2016

The present appeal arises from a money decree passed by the City Civil Court, Mumbai in Summary Suit No.6980 of 2004. The appellants, who were the ori...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Interim Relief in SARFAESI Act Case — Civil Suit Held Not Maintainable Due to Bar Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act. Borrowers Must Avail Remedy Under Section 17 Before DRT Instead of Seeking Injunction in Civil Court.

27 Sep 2016

The case involves an appeal filed by the appellants, who are borrowers and guarantors, against an order of the Commercial Division of the Bombay High ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Share Delivery — Respondent's Opposition on Grounds of Hardship Not Sustained. Court Permits Withdrawal Without Prejudice to Respondent's Rights Under the Award and Pending Proceedings.

15 Jul 2016

The present appeal was filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a judgment of a Single Judge dated 2 February...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Arrangement Involving Gift of Shares and Reduction of Securities Premium Account. The court held that a scheme involving a gift of shares held by a company in another company to its shareholders and a reduction of the securities premium account by the book value of the investment is an arrangement under Section 391(1) of the Companies Act, 1956, and the reduction of the securities premium account does not require compliance with the procedure for reduction of share capital under Sections 100-104 of the Companies Act, 1956 or Section 52 of the Companies Act, 2013.

15 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Indian Seamless Enterprises Limited, filed a petition under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking sanction of a schem...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Commodity Brokerage Dispute — Upholds Tribunal's Finding That Broker Failed to Prove Client's Liability. Member Client Agreement and Running Account Basis Did Not Shift Burden of Proof to Client Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

16 Apr 2015

The petitioner, Bonanza Commodities Brokers Pvt. Ltd., a member of Multi Commodity Exchange of India Ltd. (MCX), filed a petition under Section 34 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Share Trading Dispute — Upholds Arbitrators' Findings on Contract Notes and Liability. Court holds that failure to object to contract notes within reasonable time amounts to acceptance under NSE Bye-Laws and that arbitral tribunal's findings on facts and law are not open to challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

18 Jan 2014

The petitioner, Harinarayan Bajaj, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award date...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Exchange Dispute — Arbitrator's Refusal to Entertain Counterclaim Upheld as Within Jurisdiction. The court held that the arbitrator's decision to refrain from adjudicating the counterclaim regarding surplus in NSE capital market was within his jurisdiction and did not warrant interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

8 Mar 2013

The petitioner, Uttam Chand Garg, challenged an arbitral award dated 16th March 2009 passed by a sole arbitrator under the byelaws of the National Sto...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Arbitration Petition Challenging Rejection of Counterclaim on Limitation Grounds. Court holds that limitation for counterclaim in arbitration under BSE Byelaws runs from date of filing of claim, not from accrual of cause of action.

2 Nov 2012

The Petitioner, Hansraj Sohanlal Gouthi, HUF, through its Karta Ravi Gouthi, challenged an arbitral award dated 13 July 2009 passed by the Arbitral Tr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Exchange Dispute Due to Limitation. Claim Filed Beyond Six-Month Period Under BSE Regulation 252(2) Is Barred.

25 Sep 2012

The petitioner, Kalpana Munish Bumb, was a constituent of respondent no. 1, a trading member of the Bombay Stock Exchange. The last transaction betwee...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)