Search Results for "section 436 IPC"

159 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 159 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rejects Bail for Gang Rape Accused Despite 3-Year Incarceration, Citing Prima Facie Evidence and Seriousness of Offence Under Section 376(D) IPC. Speedy Trial Violation Claim Rejected as Charge Framed and Trial to Be Expedited.

The applicant, Nitesh Raghunath Lahange, filed a second bail application before the Bombay High Court seeking release in connection with Crime No. I-1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder, Robbery, and Arson Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Last seen together, recovery of stolen gold chain, and DNA matching on appellant's clothes established guilt beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 302, 449, 392/397, 436, and 201 IPC.

The appellant, Shivdatta @ Biltu Subhodchandra Sah, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for the murder of Bharat Panjiyara...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in DJ Halli Riot Case — Cites Parity and Length of Incarceration. Appellant entitled to bail under Section 14-A of SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989 as co-accused already released and trial not likely to conclude soon.

The judgment concerns two criminal appeals filed under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Accused in DJ Halli Mob Lynching Case Citing Parity and No Prima Facie Involvement in Murder. Petitioners accused of rioting and arson under Sections 435, 436 IPC and SC/ST Act granted bail as co-accused similarly placed were already enlarged on bail.

The judgment pertains to two criminal petitions filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking bail for the petitioner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Arson Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 427 and 436 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Suyash Rajiv Mulukh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, for offences under Sections 427 (mischief causing damage)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Mischief by Fire Case Due to Material Contradictions and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 436 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Dharam Kondiram Gumladu, was convicted under Section 436 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 by the Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, for allegedl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence of 26/11 Terrorist in Mumbai Attacks Case. Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal of Co-Accused Due to Insufficient Evidence, Finding No Perversity in Trial Court's Decision.

The Supreme Court dealt with appeals arising from the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks. The appellant, Mohammed Ajmal Kasab, a Pakistani national, was conv...