Search Results for "section 167(2) CrPC"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "section 167(2) CrPC"

54 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 54 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bail Application of Accused in Essential Commodities Act Case; Filing of Charge Sheet Within 90 Days Held to Extinguish Right to Default Bail. Filing of Charge Sheet Under IPC and Essential Commodities Act Within 90 Days of Custody Complies with Section 173(2) CrPC Despite Subsequent Permission for Further Investigation.

13 Dec 2005

The application before the Bombay High Court arose out of a criminal case registered as C.R. No. 39/2004 at Karveer Police Station, Kolhapur, against ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge to Magistrate's Order Directing Verification Under Section 200 CrPC After Order Under Section 156(3) CrPC. Pre-Cognizance Investigation Order Under Section 156(3) CrPC Precludes Post-Cognizance Verification Under Section 200 CrPC as Stages Are Mutually Exclusive.

25 Feb 2013

The petitioner, Amish Jayant Dharod, filed a criminal writ petition challenging an order of the learned Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, 2nd Court,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Sessions Court's Order Setting Aside Magistrate's Direction for Police Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC. The High Court Held That a Magistrate Can Order Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC Even After Recording Complainant's Evidence at Pre-Cognizance Stage, as Cognizance Has Not Yet Been Taken.

13 Nov 2013

The petitioner, Rajesh Chandmal Varma, filed an application before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalgaon, alleging commission of various cognizable o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR for Offences under IPC and Atrocities Act Due to Illegal Order under Section 156(3) CrPC. Magistrate's Order Under Section 156(3) After Taking Cognizance and Conducting Enquiry Under Section 202 Renders Subsequent FIR Void, as It Violates the Pre-Cognizance Stage Requirement Under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

11 Sep 2018

The dispute arose from a complaint filed by an electrician against a builder alleging non-payment of dues for electric fitting work and caste-based ab...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Land Dispute Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute. Family Settlement Mutation Entry Not Attracting Criminal Offences Under IPC Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 r/w 34.

10 Jan 2017

The applicant, Smt. Linabai @ Pramilabai Dhivare, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 before the Bo...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Application Under Section 482 CrPC Challenging Magistrate's Refusal to Order Police Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC — Magistrate's Discretion to Treat Application as Complaint Upheld as Legal and Proper.

25 Apr 2019

The applicant, Nikhil s/o Dhondiram Katke, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) challenging a...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Maintainability of Revision Against Order Under Section 156(3) CrPC. Division Bench Examines if Order Directing Police Investigation is Interlocutory and if Revision Lies Under Section 397 or 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.

21 Oct 2015

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, was seized of several criminal writ petitions and applications challenging orders passed by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Revision Against Order Under Section 156(3) CrPC. Court examines whether an order directing police investigation under Section 156(3) is interlocutory and whether a revision petition under Section 397 or 401 CrPC lies against such order.

21 Oct 2015

A batch of criminal writ petitions and applications came before the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad, raising a common question o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Investigation Order in Courier Theft Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence Against Company Employees. The court held that where a parcel is delivered intact and no open delivery is taken, no prima facie case of theft is made out against the courier company or its employee under Sections 378, 379 IPC.

7 Mar 2011

The applicants, Blue Dart Express Ltd. (a courier company) and its territorial service representative, filed a criminal application under Section 482 ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Quashing of Cheque Dishonour Complaint for Procedural Irregularities. Taking Cognizance After Recording Sworn Statement and Validity of Power of Attorney Holder's Complaint Examined Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

4 Jul 2022

The High Court of Karnataka heard writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking quashing of criminal proceedings in ...

3 4 5 6

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)