Search Results for "sand"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "sand"

264 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 264 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Mining Contract Interest Dispute — Security Deposit Does Not Carry Interest Despite Delayed Refund When Contract Expressly Bars Interest. Clause 19 of Form-L Contract Under Punjab Minor Minerals Concession Rules, 1964 Precludes Interest on Security Deposit, and Section 34 CPC Does Not Apply to Contractual Deposits.

1 Jan 2026

The case involves appeals by the State of Haryana and its officers against a judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court which directed payment of i...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Polluter Pays Principle in Tannery Pollution Case — Directs Comprehensive Compensation and Remediation for Environmental Degradation in Vellore District. The court affirmed that tanneries are strictly liable for ecological damage and health impacts, and the Loss of Ecology Authority's compensation assessment must be enforced with government backup liability.

13 Feb 2025

The Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment addressing the severe environmental degradation caused by tannery industries in Vellore Distr...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction for Illegal Sand Mining Under MMRD Act — Revision Petition Dismissed. Petitioner failed to prove ownership of land or valid license for sand extraction, and courts below correctly applied Section 4(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and Rules 3(1) and 42 of Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994.

25 Nov 2022

The petitioner, Parappa S/o Hamappa Lamani, was convicted by the Civil Judge and JMFC, Shiggaon, in C.C.No.497/2013 for the offence punishable under S...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Theft Charge Against Stone Crusher Owners for Lack of Dishonest Intention in Sand Collection. Section 379 IPC not attracted as petitioners had bona fide belief of permission and no criminal intent established.

13 Sep 2019

The judgment pertains to three criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of charge sheets i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty and Seizure Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code for Non-Covering of Sand During Transport. Failure to cover mineral with tarpaulin does not attract Sections 48(7) and 48(8) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 as those provisions apply only to illegal extraction or removal of minerals.

8 Dec 2016

The petitioner, Abdul Wasif Abdul Latif, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 2.9.2016 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Akot, imposin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Three Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC confirmed as prosecution established chain of circumstances leading to guilt.

6 Aug 2014

The appellants, original accused nos.1, 2, and 3, challenged their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for the murder of Dashrath Bu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings for Illegal Sand Mining Due to Bar Under Section 22 of Mines and Minerals Act. Prosecution for Theft Under IPC Not Maintainable Without Complaint from Authorized Officer.

13 Dec 2013

The applicants, Shaikh Yunus and Ayesha Yunus Shaikh, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness's evidence was inconsistent and uncorroborated.

6 Sep 2011

The case involves three appellants, Bablya Baliram Madhvi, Namdeo Padu Gaikwad, and Sanjay Arjun Ahire, who were convicted by the 3rd Additional Sessi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

13 Jun 2005

The case pertains to an appeal against the judgment and order dated 30th October 1996 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad at Alibag in Ses...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance — Suit Barred by Limitation. The court held that the plaint must be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC when the suit is clearly barred by limitation based on the averments in the plaint.

30 Nov -0001

The appellant, Romesh Satyanarayan Sharma, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 15.07.2005 against the respondents, Mrs...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)