Search Results for "robbery"

270 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 270 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Lack of Evidence for Robbery Conviction. Prosecution fails to prove recovery of stolen items, Supreme Court sets aside conviction of Hansraj.

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant, Hansraj, reversing previous convictions under Sections 394 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The pros...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence and Lack of Credible Conspiracy Proof. Conviction Under Sections 302/34 and 120B IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Complete Chain of Evidence Excluding All Hypotheses of Innocence.

The appeal arose from a murder case where a recently married woman, Kamla Rani, was shot and killed in 1993 while returning from her parental home on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Robbery Case Due to Lack of Identification and Recovery. Conviction under Section 392 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the accused, Shivaji Haribhau Jirase, by the trial court for an offence under Section 392 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Accused in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Lack of Conclusive Circumstantial Evidence and Flawed Investigation. Conviction under Sections 302 and 392 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Did Not Form Complete Chain Pointing to Guilt.

The appellant, Snehal Dias, was convicted by the Special Judge, NDPS, Mapusa, for the murder of Naresh Dourado and robbery of his car and other items,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction for Rash Driving Under IPC Sections 279 and 337 — Conviction Based on Consistent Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence Upheld

The applicant, Hamza Mohd. Ibrahim Ansari, was the original accused in C.C.No.769/P/1987 before the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 18th Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder and Dacoity Based on Injured Eyewitness Testimony. Testimony of Injured Witness Held Sufficient for Conviction Under Sections 395, 396, 302, 397 IPC.

The appellant, Ajaykumar Sunilkumar Sharma, was convicted by the 11th Adhoc Addl. Sessions Judge, Dewree, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No.690 of 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Test Identification Parade Not Conducted Promptly and Identification in Court Without Prior TIP Held Insufficient Under Section 395 r/w 397 IPC.

The appellants, Chandra Sudhakar Shetty and Haresh Ramesh Patel @ Gaunda, were convicted by the trial court for the offence punishable under Section 3...