Search Results for "revision under Mamlatdar’s Court Act"

247 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 247 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition of Heirs in Land Mutation Dispute — Orders Certification of Mutation Entries Despite Pending Civil Suit. Revenue Authorities Cannot Refuse Mutation Based on Disputed Title Without Adjudicating Succession Rights Under Gujarat Land Revenue Code, 1879.

The present petition was filed by the heirs of the deceased Maniben Keshabhai Parmar, seeking a writ of mandamus to quash and set aside orders passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State's Delay Condonation Application in Land Acquisition Appeal Due to Unexplained 793-Day Delay. Intra-court appeal against writ court order dated 23.06.2023 filed with 793 days delay; no proper explanation offered despite opportunity to file better affidavit.

The State of Gujarat and others filed an intra-court appeal against an order dated 23.06.2023 passed by a writ court in Special Civil Application No. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Revenue Tribunal Order in Tenancy Revision Due to Gross Delay. Inordinate Delay of 34 Years in Challenging Mamlatdar's Order Cannot Be Condoned Without Proper Explanation Under Tenancy Act.

The State of Gujarat, through the Deputy Collector, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging an order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revision Challenging Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Tenancy Dispute — Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Barred Under Agricultural Tenancy Act as Plaint Discloses Cause of Action for Easementary Rights and Possessory Remedies.

The petitioner, Comunidade of Calapur, filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the CPC challenging the order dated 07/09/2017 passed b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Revision Application Under Mamlatdar's Court Act Due to Bona Fide Mistake of Lawyer. Petitioner's Delay in Filing Revision Before Additional Collector Condoned as Lawyer's Erroneous Advice Constitutes Sufficient Cause Under Section 5 of Limitation Act.

The petitioner, Mohan Khemlo Bandekar, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 16/10/2014 passed by the Additional Collector-II, North Goa, r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Revision Application Under Mamlatdar's Court Act Due to Bona fide Mistake of Lawyer. Petitioner's delay in filing revision before Additional Collector instead of Deputy Collector condoned as sufficient cause under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The petitioner, Mohan Khemlo Bandekar, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court at Goa, chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Mundkar Claim Against Respondents on Government Land — Act Not Applicable to Government-Owned Land. Section 39 of Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975 exempts government lands, and Class II occupancy does not confer ownership.

The petitioner, Shankar Babani Halarnkar, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Administrative Tribunal in Mundkar Revision Application N...