Search Results for "religious idol"

72 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 72 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Government Order Handing Over Mahabaleshwara Temple Administration to Ramachandrapura Mutt. Petitioners Allege Violation of Rights as Registered Trust and Seek Restoration of Previous Board of Trustees Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution.

Multiple writ petitions and writ appeals were filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru challenging Government Order No. KAM.E.56 MU.A.B. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Death Sentence Confirmation and Appeals against Conviction in 2000 Church Bomb Blast. Accused were convicted under Sections 120-B, 121-A, 124-A, 153-A IPC by Trial Court for conspiracy and bomb blast at St. Peter and Paul Church, Bangalore.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard together a criminal reference for confirmation of death sentence and two criminal appeals arising from ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Writ Petitions Against Government Order Appointing Administrator for Murugha Mutt Under Articles 162 and 31A of Constitution; Appointment Follows Pontiff's Judicial Custody in Criminal Case

The writ petitions, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenged a Government Order dated 13.12.2022 appointing a retired IAS offi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision That Nasik Math Not Registerable Under Bombay Public Trusts Act Due to Lack of Public Worship. Definition of 'Math' Under Section 2(9) Requires Religious Instruction and Spiritual Service, Which Were Absent in the Nasik Branch.

The case concerned the applicability of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 to a branch Math of the Shringeri Math situated at Nasik. The Assistant Cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Husband's Appeal Against Restitution of Conjugal Rights Decree, Holds No Valid Marriage Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Essential Ceremonies Like Saptapadi Not Proved, Hence Marriage Invalid Under Section 7 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

The appellant-husband filed a Family Court Appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 read with Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955...