Search Results for "redevelopment scheme challenge"

306 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 306 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Implementation. Court upholds eligibility determination and authorization of developer under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash proceedings leading to implementation of a Slum ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to SRA Order in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. CEO's Direction to Process Letter of Intent Upheld as 70% Consent of Eligible Members Was Validly Obtained Under DCR 33(10).

The case involves a slum rehabilitation scheme under DCR 33(10) of the Development Control Regulations for Greater Mumbai. The petitioners, Lokhandwal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging AGRC Order Upholding Developer Appointment in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. Dispute between two groups of slum dwellers over choice of developer; court upholds AGRC's decision based on consent and merits.

The petitioners, New Jagruti Co-operative Housing Society Limited (Proposed) and another, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Apex Griev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Writ Petition Challenging SRA Eviction Order — Petitioner Lacked Locus Standi as Non-Owner. Slum Rehabilitation Authority's Order to Hand Over Possession to Original Slum Dwellers Upheld Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Transcon-Sheth Creators Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition in the High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Development Rights Certificate in Land Reservation Case. Held That Landowner Entitled to DRC for Entire Reserved Area Under Section 126(1)(c) of MRTP Act, 1966.

The appellants, Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited and its constituted attorney, owned land bearing CTS No. 2B (part) and 3B in Mumbai, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Lease Claimants in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute — Welfare Legislation Overrides Equitable Rights. High Court's Order Setting Aside HPC Decision and Allowing Redevelopment Upheld as Slum Act Takes Precedence Over Prospective Lessees' Claims.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal arising from a slum rehabilitation dispute in Mumbai. The appellants, legal representatives of Lullu Vas, claim...