Search Results for "raiding party"

392 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 392 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Shailendra Manikrao Bakare, was convicted by the Special Judge, Pune, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of in Child Trafficking Case Under IPC and ITPA -- Minor Victim's Testimony Deemed Credible Despite Minor Contradictions

The Supreme Court dismissed the criminal appeal filed by the appellant, K.P. Kirankumar @ Kiran, against his conviction in a child trafficking and com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Acquits Police Officers in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole trap witness was interested and independent witnesses turned hostile.

The case involves two appeals by accused police officers (Ramaiah, Police Head Constable, and T.R. Hanumanthaiah, Police Sub-Inspector) against their ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50. Failure to Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Search Illegal and Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellant, Vijay Dhanbahadur Thapa, was convicted by the Special Judge, Mapusa, in Special Criminal Case No. 12/2008 for an offence punishable und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Head Constable in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Section 161 IPC and Section 5(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Wamanrao Pawar, a Head Constable, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati in Special Case No. 3 of 1989 for offences u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Doctor in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Dr. Smt. Usha Dhondiram Sarwade, a Casualty Medical Officer at Government Medical College and Hospital, Aurangabad, was convicted by th...