Supreme Court Rules Appeal Does Not Abate if Estate is Sufficiently Represented.
12 Jan 2026This judgment concerns two connected civil appeals arising from suits for specific performance and eviction. In Civil Appeal No. 172 of 2026, the High...
Search Results for "purchase pendente lite"
69 result(s) found
Found 69 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Execution Objection Case — Upholds Summary Rejection of Objection Petition Under Order 21 Rule 97 CPC. Executing Court Not Required to Adjudicate Title When Objection is Frivolous and Collusive.
17 Nov 2025The appellant, Kamal W/o Vishwanath Jadhav, filed a second appeal challenging the judgment and decree dated 11.09.2025 passed by the first appellate C...
- 180
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Compromise Decree in Property Suit Despite Third-Party Intervention Claim — Consent Terms Binding on Parties, Intervener's Rights Not Affected. The Court held that a compromise between the original parties does not affect the rights of a third party claiming independent title, and such third party need not be impleaded in the suit.
29 Nov 2024The judgment arises from a suit filed by Vinesh Rashmikant Shah and others (Plaintiffs) against Pee Jay Traders and others (Defendants) concerning dis...
- 356
Supreme Court
"High Court Decrees Specific Performance; Doctrine of Lis Pendens Applied to Override Subsequent Sale" "Litigation pendente lite affects all subsequent alienations, regardless of notice to the purchaser."
14 Oct 2024The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court’s decision that allowed the specific performance of a sale agreement. The High Court applied the ...
- 736
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit Against Sick Industrial Company — Suspension of Proceedings Under Section 22(1) of SICA Does Not Bar Suit for Unadmitted Debt. High Court's Grant of 24% Compound Interest Reduced to 12% Simple Interest.
29 Apr 2024The case involves a dispute between Fertilizer Corporation of India Ltd. (FCIL), a public sector undertaking, and M/s Coromandal Sacks Private Limited...
- 413
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Delivery Warrant in Execution Proceedings for Non-Compliance with Order XXI Rule 35 CPC — Judgment Debtors Entitled to Notice Before Delivery of Possession. The court held that failure to issue notice under Order XXI Rule 22 CPC before ordering delivery of possession violates natural justice and renders the execution proceedings void.
16 Jun 2022The petitioners, Dada Balu Rooge and Smt. Vasundara, were judgment debtors in Execution Petition No.73/2014 pending before the Principal Senior Civil ...
- 63
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Restores Trial Court's Decree for Money Recovery Instead of Specific Performance. The High Court erred in granting specific performance as the transaction was found to be a loan with collateral security under the Specific Relief Act, 1963.
13 Aug 2019The Supreme Court allowed the appeal by the subsequent purchasers (appellants) against the High Court's decree granting specific performance of an agr...
- 116
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Refund Order in Consumer Case Against Builder for Delayed Possession. Builder's Failure to Deliver Villa by Agreed Date Constitutes Deficiency in Service Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
30 Jul 2019The case involves an appeal by Marvel Omega Builders Pvt. Ltd. and another against the judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission...
- 325
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Insurance Claim in Fire Damage Case — Surveyor Reports Cannot Be Ignored Without Valid Reasons. Appointment of Multiple Surveyors Without Justification Leads to Adoption of First Surveyor's Report Under Section 64UM of Insurance Act, 1938.
1 May 2019The case involves a dispute between M/s New India Assurance Co. Ltd. (Insurance Company) and M/s Luxra Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. (Complainant), an industr...
- 382
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Interim Maintenance Order in Favor of Wife Under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act — Husband's Business Assets and Bank Transactions Considered to Determine Income. The court held that the Family Court correctly considered the husband's business interests, bank transactions, and assets to assess his income for interim maintenance, rejecting the husband's contention that only income tax returns should be considered.
16 Nov 2010The case involves a writ petition filed by the husband, Shirish H. Garg, challenging an order of interim maintenance passed by the Family Court, Bandr...
