Search Results for "psychotropic substance"

274 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 274 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under PITNDPS Act for Lack of Material Linking to Public Order. Single FIR and bail rejection insufficient to justify 'Illicit Traffic' under Section 2(e) of Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988.

The petitioner, Raydhanbhai Valjibhai Gabhu, through his brother Jayesh Valjibhai Gabu, challenged a preventive detention order dated 11.12.2025 passe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under NDPS Act for LSD Possession — Compliance with Sections 50 and 52-A Established. Court finds no tampering with contraband and affirms ten-year rigorous imprisonment for possession of commercial quantity of LSD.

The appellant, Subodh Levi, was convicted by the Special Court under Section 22(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance of Section 50 and Doubtful Chain of Custody. LSD Recovery Allegation Fails as Prosecution Could Not Establish That the Seized Substance Was the Same as That Tested by the Chemical Analyser.

The appellant, Roque @ Rocky Fernandes, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, North Goa, Mapusa in Special Criminal Case No.22/2015 for offe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 and Doubtful Seizure. Failure to Offer Personal Search Before Gazetted Officer and Inconsistent Evidence Regarding Recovery of Contraband Lead to Acquittal.

The appellants, Gurmeet Singh and Pyarelal Shridhar Keer @ Pahalwan, were convicted by the NDPS Special Judge, Greater Bombay, for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 and Other Mandatory Provisions. Failure to Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Search Illegal and Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellants, Raju Dhanju Rathod and Ramesh Liganna Mudraj, were convicted by the Special Court for NDPS, Bombay, for offences under Section 20(c) r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42 of NDPS Act, 1985. Secret Information Not Forwarded to Superior Officer, Search Vitiated.

The appellant, Kallumal Jaidmal Kukareja @ Kallumama, was convicted by the NDPS Special Judge, Greater Bombay, for an offence punishable under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Cancels Bail in NDPS Case — Commercial Quantity of Opium Determined by Total Weight, Not Morphine Content. The court held that the Special Judge erred in calculating morphine content to bring the quantity below the commercial threshold, and the bar under Section 37 of NDPS Act applies.

The Union of India filed an application for cancellation of bail granted to the respondents (original accused) by the Special Judge (NDPS Act), Pune, ...