Search Results for "property identification"

838 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 838 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction Under Sections 302, 201, 34 IPC in Dismemberment Murder Case. Accused Challenge Life Imprisonment Contending Weak Circumstantial Evidence and Tutored Witnesses.

The case involved the brutal murder and dismemberment of Archideb Bhattacharjee in 2003 after he refused to pay an extortion demand of Rs.40,000 to th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction Under Section 364A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand for Ransom and Relied on Uncorroborated Extra-Judicial Confessions and Unreliable Dying Declaration.

The case pertains to the kidnapping and murder of one Suresh Kumar, a financier, on 19.08.2015. The deceased was last seen on that day and his dead bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Four Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. The court held that the prosecution successfully proved the conspiracy and murder beyond reasonable doubt, relying on motive, last seen, and recovery of weapons.

The case pertains to the murder of a young girl, Monika Dashrath Kirnapure, on 11.03.2011 near KDK College, Nagpur. The appellants, Krunal Jaiswal, Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Robbery and Wrongful Restraint in Jewellery Shop Robbery Case. Victim's Identification and Recovery of Stolen Property Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Sections 392 and 341 IPC.

The appellant, Arshadali Shaikh Usmanali Shaikh, was convicted by the 4th AdHoc Additional Sessions Judge at Sewree, Mumbai, for offences under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Property Suit — Trial Court's Dismissal of Suit Upheld as Proper. The appellate court erred in remanding the suit for fresh decision without setting aside the trial court's findings on limitation and adverse possession.

The appellant, original defendant No. 1, filed an appeal against the order of remand dated 16.7.2013 passed by the District Judge-I, North Goa, at Pan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 395 IPC set aside as identification parade was not conducted and recovery of stolen articles was not linked to accused.

The case pertains to two criminal appeals filed by accused persons convicted under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for dacoity. The p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Lack of Identification and Recovery. Conviction under Sections 395, 397, 457, 380, 342, 427 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove identity of accused and recovery of stolen articles.

The appellant, Polisha Ganpat Pawar, was convicted by the Vth Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik on April 12, 2002 in Sessions Case No.175 of 2001 for ...