Search Results for "promotion dispute"

1086 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1086 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by State and Employee in Service Rule Relaxation Dispute. High Court's Quashing of Government Order Granting Promotion Set Aside as Relaxation Was Validly Granted.

The Supreme Court heard two sets of appeals arising from a judgment of the Madras High Court in Writ Appeal No. 996 of 2015 and an order dismissing Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Promotion Petition - No Fundamental Right to Promotion, Educational Qualification Criteria Upheld Under Constitution of India

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 14, 16, and 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the Gujarat Civil Services Tribunal's ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition of Junior Scientific Assistants Seeking Higher Pay Scale Without Promotion. Higher pay scale of Rs. 2000-3200 linked to actual promotion to Senior Scientific Assistant, not automatic entitlement under Circular dated 13.05.2002.

The petitioners, eleven individuals appointed as Junior Scientific Assistants (JSA) with the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC) between 1979 and 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeals in Promotion Dispute — Executive Instructions Cannot Override Statutory Recruitment Rules. Promotion to Assistant Regional Transport Officer must be based on statutory rules, not executive instructions, and seniority cannot be ignored.

The case involves two appeals by the State of Odisha against a common judgment of the Orissa High Court, which dismissed intra-court appeals by the St...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Seniority Dispute, Quashing High Court Division Bench Judgment. Seniority lists prepared based on date of dispatch of select lists were held arbitrary and contrary to Rule 5 of Uttar Pradesh Government Servants Seniority Rules, 1991, requiring fresh merit-based list.

The dispute arose from seniority lists dated 05.09.2006 and 05.03.2010 for Junior Engineers in the Department of Minor Irrigation, Uttar Pradesh, invo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds CAT Order in Railway Promotion Dispute — Criteria for Assessment of Candidates for PHOD Post Held Arbitrary. The Court directed review DPC for notional promotion from date juniors were promoted with consequential benefits.

The Union of India and another (petitioners) challenged the judgment and order dated 23rd January 2001 of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in...