Search Results for "promoters"

530 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 530 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies SEBI's Jurisdiction in Investor Compensation Claims Under Securities Law. SEBI Lacks Power to Award Direct Compensation but Can Order Disgorgement of Ill-Gotten Gains for Restitution Under Sections 11 and 11B of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.

The dispute originated in 2005 when the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) issued a show-cause notice to M/s. Vital Communications Limited ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs NCLT to Expedite Approval of Resolution Plan in Home Buyers' Insolvency Case, Upholding IBC Moratorium. Execution of Consumer Forum Order Stayed Under Section 14 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, with Personal Liability Issues Referred to Adjudicating Authority.

The dispute involved home buyers who had entered into agreements with a developer for a housing project, with possession due in 2014. The developer ab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Co-operative Tribunal Order — Dispute Regarding Land Purchase and Construction Not Maintainable Under Section 91 of MCS Act as It Involves Pre-Society Promoters' Agreement, Not a Society Dispute.

The petitioner, Mayfair Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 03/07/2006 of the President,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Financial Institution in Suit for Recovery of Money Due to Failure to Prove Loan Agreement and Liability of Promoters. Equity Participation by Appellant Did Not Create a Debtor-Creditor Relationship with Respondents.

The appellant, EDC Limited, a financial institution, filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 17,50,000/- with interest against the respondents, M/s. GKB Opht...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Promoter's Challenge to Pledge of Shares During Lock-In Period — Pledge Held Valid as Lock-In Restricts Transfer of Title, Not Interest. Court Rules That Pledge Under Section 172 of Contract Act Does Not Violate SEBI ICDR Regulations, 2009.

The plaintiff, Kannan Vishwanath, a promoter and managing director of Dr. Datson Labs Limited, filed a suit and notice of motion seeking a declaration...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Competent Authority Order in MOFA Dispute — Failure to Provide Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Section 5A of MOFA Requires Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Before Directing Conveyance of Land to Society.

The petitioners, Mazda Construction Company, Maredia Enterprises, and Sultanabad CHS Ltd. (Proposed), challenged an order dated 11.04.2012 passed by t...