Search Results for "prior demand and refusal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "prior demand and refusal"

737 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 737 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator Despite SARFAESI and RDDB Act Objections — Arbitration Agreement in Sanction Letter Held Enforceable and Not Barred by Statutory Remedies. The court held that Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act and Section 18 of the RDDB Act do not bar arbitration proceedings, and the applicant's claim under the Sanction Letter dated 19th August 2019 is arbitrable.

15 Oct 2024

The applicant, Tata Capital Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arb...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Appeals by Aggregators and Bike Taxi Owners Against State’s Refusal to Grant Permits for Bike Taxi Services. Dispute Centers on Whether Motorcycle Owners Are Entitled to Render Bike Taxi Services Under the Motor Vehicles Act and Karnataka Rules.

23 Jan 2026

The case comprised five writ appeals filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging a common order dated 02.04.2025 passed b...

High Court

Full Bench of the Bombay High Court Considers Reference on Interpretation of Clauses 96 and 97 of MCGM General Conditions of Contract. The Court Examines Whether Compliance with Clause 96 is a Precondition for Invoking Arbitration under Clause 97.

8 Feb 2017

The appeal arose from an arbitration petition concerning a contractual dispute between a contractor and the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree Against Tenants for Default in Rent Payment, Dismisses Landlords' Cross-Appeal on Subletting. The Court held that Defendant Nos. 2 and 3 were direct tenants of the Plaintiffs and not sub-tenants, and decreed eviction solely on ground of default in payment of rent.

15 Oct 2024

The case involves cross proceedings between the landlords (Plaintiffs) and the tenants (Defendant Nos. 2 and 3) concerning a suit premises in Pune. Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Section 143-A of Negotiable Instruments Act Directory — Interim Compensation Requires Recording of Reasons. Court clarifies that Section 143-A is not mandatory and reasons must be recorded for quantum under Section 143-A(2).

7 Jul 2022

The judgment arises from two criminal writ petitions filed by Ashwin Ashokrao Karokar (accused) against Laxmikant Govind Joshi (complainant) under the...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Motion to Set Aside Arrest of Vessel in Admiralty Suit: Arrest of M.V. Rainbow Ace Challenged on Ground of Non-Establishment of Common Beneficial Ownership Between Vessel Owner and Defaulting Charterer. Defendant Vessel Owner Asserts No Common Beneficial Ownership with Charterer, Seeking to Vacate Ex-Parte Arrest Order in Maritime Claim for Damages Under Voyage Charterparty.

6 May 2013

In the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Admiralty and Vice Admiralty jurisdiction, the applicant, owner of the vessel M.V. Rainbow Ace, filed a not...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Petition for Termination of Standing Arbitral Tribunal's Mandate in Railway Construction Contract Dispute. Petitioner Seeks Appointment of New Arbitral Tribunal Under Sections 11(6), 14(2), and 15(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Alleging Lack of Independence of Serving Railway Officer Arbitrators.

12 Dec 2019

The petitioner, ITD Cementation India Ltd., a company engaged in construction and infrastructure, was awarded a contract by the respondent, Konkan Rai...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions for Alleged Wilful Disobedience of Earlier Judgment in SARFAESI Auction Dispute — No Contempt Made Out as Subsequent Transfers Were Not in Breach of Court Orders. The Court held that the earlier judgment did not contain any specific direction restraining transfers, and the respondents had acted under colour of subsequent orders from the DRT and High Court.

13 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court dismissed contempt petitions filed by Celir LLP, the successful auction purchaser, alleging wilful disobedience of its earlier judgm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Injunction Bank Guarantee Encashment in Commercial Dispute. No Case of Fraud or Irretrievable Injustice Made Out to Restrain Bank Guarantee Invocation Under Contract Law Principles.

22 Mar 2017

The appeal arises from an order of the learned Single Judge refusing to grant an injunction restraining the respondent from encashing a bank guarantee...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Appeals and Sets Aside Interim Injunction Protecting Non-Disposal Shares — Holds that Non-Disposal Agreement Shares were Meant to Secure Recompense Obligation under Loan Purchase Agreement for Shortfall after Sale of Pledged Shares. Assignment of Loan Did Not Extinguish the Loan Purchase Agreement and the Bank Could Enforce the NDA to Recover Shortfall.

3 Dec 2015

The appeals arose from a suit filed by United Breweries (Holdings) Limited (UBHL) and Kingfisher Finvest (India) Limited against ICICI Bank Limited an...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)