Search Results for "presumption rebuttable"

353 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 353 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals in Dishonour of Cheque Cases, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Section 139 of NI Act applies when signature and issuance of cheque are admitted, shifting burden on accused to rebut.

The appellant, Mr. Ashfaq Rasheed Shaik, filed six criminal appeals under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C. against the judgment of acquittal dated 07.06.2018 pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Failure of Consideration. Complainant failed to prove legally enforceable debt as share transfer was not completed under MOU.

The case involves two appeals filed by Harendra Ramchandra Pathak (complainant) against the acquittal of Dharmendra Ratan Mhatre and Rajendra Ratan Mh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit — Loan Repayment Claim Upheld Despite Lack of Written Agreement. Preponderance of Probabilities Favored Plaintiff as Defendant Admitted Receipt of Money but Failed to Prove Alternative Purpose.

The appellant, Mr. Manjunath S., filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Reverses Acquittal Under Section 138 NI Act. Presumption under Sections 118(a) and 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 held to be in favour of complainant unless rebutted by accused.

The appellant, Sachin Food Processor, a registered partnership firm, filed a criminal complaint against the respondent, Sanjay T. Pathak, under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 applies when signature on cheque is admitted, shifting burden on accused to rebut existence of debt.

The appellant, Bapurao s/o Motiram Mankar, a senior citizen, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Complainant's Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Reverses Acquittal Due to Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands unless rebutted by accused with probable defence.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by the original complainant, Sandeep Shirodkar, against the acquittal of the accused, Shankar Dhawaskar, ...