Search Results for "penetration"

153 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 153 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Partially Allows Criminal Appeal -- Acquits Appellant Under Section 376-AB of IPC In POCSO u/s 4(2)Case Due To Lack Of Kidnapping Evidence -- Convictions Under Sections 363, 354-A(2) and 8 of POCSO maintained Upheld

The appellant challenged his conviction for offences under IPC and POCSO Act. The High Court analyzed the evidence, focusing on the victim's testimony...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and SC/ST Act Case Due to Material Contradictions and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Rape of Minor Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant-accused, Arvindbhai @ Bhadabhai Shanabhai @ Shankarbhai Chauhan, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and SC/ST Act Case Due to Material Contradictions and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Rape of Minor Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant-accused, Arvindbhai @ Bhadabhai Shanabhai @ Shankarbhai Chauhan, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 452, 376AB, 506 IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Anand S/o Durgappa Gollar, was convicted by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, FTSC-I, Belagavi in Special Case No.505/2023 fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Rape of Minor Child Under Section 376(2)(f) IPC. Seven-Year-Old Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Prompt FIR.

The appellant, Dilip Bharat Gavand @ Kanwa, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, for the offence of rape under Section 376(2)(f) of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape of Minor in Absence of Direct Evidence of Penetration. Circumstantial Evidence and Medical Report Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Section 376(2)(f) IPC.

The appellant, Deepak Shankarrao Borkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, in Special Case No. 7 of 2012 for offences under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape of Minor Case Due to Contradictory Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC set aside as prosecutrix's evidence was inconsistent and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Onkar Timaji Shende, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for the offence punishable under Section 376(2)(f) of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape of Minor Case Due to Material Contradictions and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 342 and 376(2)(f) IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was inconsistent and medical evidence did not support forcible penetration.

The appellant, Vijay Prahlad Warankar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon on 24 July 1998 for offences under Sections 342 (wrong...