Search Results for "partners not impleaded"

146 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 146 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Conviction under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 set aside as complainant failed to establish that the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt or liability.

The revision petition was filed by Sri. Shanmugam (petitioner) against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 03.12.2022 passed in C.C.No.259/2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree Against Tenants for Default in Rent Payment, Dismisses Landlords' Cross-Appeal on Subletting. The Court held that Defendant Nos. 2 and 3 were direct tenants of the Plaintiffs and not sub-tenants, and decreed eviction solely on ground of default in payment of rent.

The case involves cross proceedings between the landlords (Plaintiffs) and the tenants (Defendant Nos. 2 and 3) concerning a suit premises in Pune. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Temporary Injunction in MOFA Conveyance Suit. Concurrent findings of trial court and appellate court that plaintiff failed to establish prima facie case for injunction upheld.

The petitioner, Sita Vihar Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the concurrent rejection of its application for tempor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Authority's Grant of Scheme to Another Developer. Court upholds SRA's decision based on eligibility criteria and policy, finding no arbitrariness or violation of principles of natural justice.

The Petitioners, Dyna Estate Pvt. Ltd. (a developer) and Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Nagar Sahakari Griha Nirman Sanstha (a proposed cooperative society of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Reservation for Sports Complex in Development Plan. Court upholds reservation of land for a multipurpose sports complex under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, rejecting claims of non-implementation and lack of public purpose.

The Bharatiya Adhyatmic Society, a public charitable trust, owned land in Chembur, Mumbai. The land was reserved for a 'Chembur Multipurpose Complex' ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Partition Suit, Upholds Trial Court's Decree for Partition and Separate Possession. The court held that the suit for partition was maintainable and that the plaintiffs had established their share in the joint family property.

The case involves a partition suit filed by the appellants (plaintiffs) against the respondents (defendants) seeking partition and separate possession...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Upholds Arbitral Award in BOT Contract Dispute — Reduces Interest Rate from 18% to 12%. Court holds that arbitrator's findings on breach and damages are not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Agarsons Container Terminals, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Shareholders in Patent Ownership Suit — Applicants Holding 6.3% Shares Have Sufficient Interest in Subject Matter of Suit. Shareholders are proper parties under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC when the suit concerns company assets that affect share value.

The applicants, Percy Rutton Kavasmaneck and Aban Percy Kavasmaneck, filed a Chamber Summons seeking impleadment as party defendants in Suit No. 2932 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Partner in Suit by Firm Despite Non-Compliance with Order 30 Rule 4 CPC — No Amendment of Plaint Required for Adding Partner as Co-Plaintiff. Partner of a firm can be added as co-plaintiff without amending plaint as firm is not a separate legal entity.

The appellant, Manohar Kashinath Vyawahare, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the order of the learned Single Judge dismissing his application for...