Search Results for "partition demand"

347 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 347 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Partition Suit — Order II Rule 2 CPC Bar Not Applicable to Defendants. Held that defendants in a partition suit are not required to claim their share and the bar under Order II Rule 2 CPC does not apply to them, setting aside rejection of plaint.

The case involves a Regular Second Appeal filed by Revanamma against the judgment and decree of the Senior Civil Judge at Chittapur in O.S. No. 36 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Marriage and Consequential Rights Over Suit Property; Courts Below Correctly Appreciated Evidence.

The appellant, Basangouda, filed a suit for declaration and injunction in O.S. No. 20/2006 before the Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.), Raichur, claim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Trial Court Order in Final Decree Proceedings for Lack of Jurisdiction — Order on I.A.Nos.15, 16 and 17 in FDP No.2/2008 Quashed for Exceeding Scope of Preliminary Decree and Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

The present writ petition was filed by the petitioners (defendants in the original suit) challenging the order dated 10.06.2022 passed by the learned ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Partition Appeal and Remands for Fresh Consideration of Cross-objection. High Court's dismissal of cross-objection without merits set aside; matter remanded for adjudication of partition claims.

The case involves a partition suit filed by the respondents (original plaintiffs) in O.S. No.73 of 2004 before the Additional Civil Judge, Hubli, seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Daughters' Partition Appeal Against Father in Hindu Joint Family Property Dispute. Daughters Held Entitled to Share as Coparceners Under Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 as Amended by Act 39 of 2005.

The appellants, R. Sandhya and R. Swetha, daughters of S.R. Raju, filed a suit for partition and separate possession of their 1/3 share each in the sc...