Search Results for "owner impleadment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "owner impleadment"

341 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 341 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order Disposing Impleadment Application as Infructuous in Suit for Recovery of Money and Declaration of Title. Appellant's claim for impleadment based on alleged agreement to sell was not pressed as the suit had been decreed and execution proceedings were pending.

4 Jun 2019

The appeal arose from an order dated 18th January 2019 passed by the learned Single Judge in Chamber Summons No. 1280 of 2018 in Suit No. 461 of 2010....

High Court

High Court Upholds Impleadment of Complainant as Intervener in Appeal Under Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act. Complainant Upon Whose Complaint Municipal Action Was Initiated Held to be Proper Party, Permitted to Participate as Intervener Without Enlarging Scope.

20 Jul 2026

The petitioner, owner of a property in Mysuru, obtained a sanctioned plan for construction of a residential house. The Mysuru City Corporation, acting...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Rejection of Impleadment Application in Perpetual Injunction Suit. Impleadment of Third Party Not Permitted Under Order I Rule 10 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 as No Relief Sought Against It and Suit is Right in Personam, Not Right in Rem.

23 Mar 2026

The dispute originated from a suit for perpetual injunction filed by the petitioner against Nanded Waghala City Municipal Corporation concerning prope...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Order to Implead Plaintiff in Suit for Specific Performance — Petitioner Not a Necessary Party Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. Subsequent purchaser pendente lite cannot claim impleadment as a matter of right; decree binds all persons claiming under vendor.

13 Apr 2015

The petitioner, Smt. Lakshmamma, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 30.07.2013 ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Impleadment of Property Owner in Writ Petition Challenging Building Rules Due to Direct Impact of Interim Order. Owner's Building Sealed and Demolition Ordered Based on Interpretation of Interim Order Keeping New Rules in Abeyance Under Punjab Unified Building Rules, 2025.

8 Apr 2026

The dispute originated from a writ petition (CWP No. 38742 of 2025) challenging the Punjab Unified Building Rules, 2025. The High Court passed an inte...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeal Against High Court Order Impleading Purchasers in Second Appeal. High Court Allowed Condonation of Delay and Impleadment Under Order I Rule 10 and Order XXII Rule 10 CPC Despite Lis Pendens.

27 Jul 2026

The litigation originates from a property dispute between the widows of Girdhari Lal. The original plaintiff Bhagwan Dai filed a suit claiming exclusi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Owner's Impleadment in Licensee's Suit Against Municipal Corporation for Demolition. Owner is a necessary party under Order I Rule 10 CPC as the suit directly affects the owner's right to property and the owner has a right to be heard before any order affecting his property is passed.

29 Nov 2023

The case involves a reference to a larger bench of the Bombay High Court to resolve a conflict of views among single judges regarding whether the owne...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compromise Decree in Property Suit Despite Third-Party Intervention Claim — Consent Terms Binding on Parties, Intervener's Rights Not Affected. The Court held that a compromise between the original parties does not affect the rights of a third party claiming independent title, and such third party need not be impleaded in the suit.

29 Nov 2024

The judgment arises from a suit filed by Vinesh Rashmikant Shah and others (Plaintiffs) against Pee Jay Traders and others (Defendants) concerning dis...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Impleadment of Daughter in Partition Suit as Necessary Party Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. Daughter Claiming Share as Class I Heir Under Hindu Succession Act Must Be Impleaded in Suit Affecting Parents' Properties.

9 Apr 2019

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal against the rejection of an impleadment application. The background involves a 1966 suit for partition filed by a ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Property Dispute — Technical Defect of Verification Cured. Amendment sought for correcting property description and challenging subsequent notice is allowed as no prejudice caused to other side.

5 Jan 2010

The petitioner, original plaintiff, filed a suit for declaration that a notice dated 29th January 2008 issued by the first respondent (Commissioner of...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)