Search Results for "order allowing counter claim"

853 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 853 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiffs' Suit for License Fee and Compensation, Allows Defendant's Counter-Claim for Losses Due to Suppression of No Development Zone Status. Plaintiffs held liable for fraudulent misrepresentation regarding land use, entitling Defendant to damages for demolished tower.

The plaintiffs, owners of a larger property in Madh, Malad, Mumbai, entered into a leave and license agreement with the defendant, a telecom company, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitrator's Interim Order Directing Security in Dredging Contract Dispute. Section 37(2)(b) Appeal Fails as Arbitrator's Order for Bank Guarantee of Rs. 5,66,30,579/- Upheld Pending Final Award.

The present Commercial Arbitration Petition was filed under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act) by Karanja Terminal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restoring Arbitral Award That Declared Termination of Master Asset Purchase Agreement by Repudiation. Court Holds That Single Judge Exceeded Scope of Section 34 by Reappreciating Evidence and Substituting His Own View.

The appeal arises from a dispute between V Hotels Ltd (appellant) and Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt Ltd (respondent no. 1) concerning a Master Asset Purc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Concurrent findings of fact on possession and part performance under Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 upheld.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the legal representatives of the original sole defendant against the judgment and decree passed by the lowe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Property Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Findings Are Not Perverse or Contrary to Law.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original claimant Inacio Amorim V. D'Costa, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Termination of Arbitrator's Mandate Under Section 14 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for De Facto Inability to Perform Functions. Arbitrator's Order Returning Statement of Claim and Rejecting Application for Termination of Mandate Set Aside as Without Jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Amar Tea Distributors, a partnership firm, entered into a Distributor Agreement with the respondent, Coca-Cola India Pvt. Ltd., on 7th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Television Production Dispute — Rejects Claim for Loss of Reputation. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's finding that claimant failed to prove loss of reputation due to alleged breach of contract.

The petitioners, Star India Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Upholds Arbitral Award in BOT Contract Dispute — Reduces Interest Rate from 18% to 12%. Court holds that arbitrator's findings on breach and damages are not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Agarsons Container Terminals, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral...