Search Results for "oral intimation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "oral intimation"

1286 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1286 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat President for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Notice Period. Notice period of 15 days under Section 49(2A) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 is mandatory and cannot be waived; motion passed on 14th day invalid.

1 Feb 2025

The petitioner, Smt. Sharanamma, was the President of Hiresingangutti Gram Panchayat. A no-confidence motion was moved against her by 18 members of th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Title Dispute Against Government — Holds That Government Cannot Unilaterally Resume Land Without Following Due Process and Payment of Compensation. Court Restores Trial Court Decree Declaring Appellants' Title Based on Valid Sale Deed and Pattadar Passbook, Setting Aside High Court's Reversal.

24 Mar 2025

The case involves a dispute over 3.34 acres of land in Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh. The appellants claimed title through a chain of transactions ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Refund of Admitted Amount in Income Tax Rectification Order — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Rs.833 Crores Under Section 245 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that the revenue cannot retain the admitted refund amount and directed refund within four weeks, subject to verification.

26 Jun 2020

The petitioner, Vodafone Idea Limited, filed a Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a Writ of Mandamus for refund of Rs.1009,43,88,637/-...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Appeals Filed by Accused Persons Against Conviction for Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder U/S 304-II IPC; Critical of Prosecution's Failure to Produce Prior Report Given at Police Booth. The Court Emphasized that the First Information Must be Earliest Report and Its Non-Production Would Attract Adverse Inference.

10 Apr 2018

The two criminal appeals arose from the judgment and order of conviction dated 04.05.2005 passed by the Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice Due to 12-Year Delay in Adjudication — Principles of Timely Adjudication Under Service Tax Law. Inordinate delay and corporate restructuring rendered adjudication futile, leading to quashing of show cause notice under Article 226.

22 Aug 2023

The petitioner, IDFC First Bank Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of a show cause notice dat...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Revenue in Income Tax Reassessment Case on Limitation and Computation Grounds. Reassessment under Sections 147 and 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Valid as Assessee Failed to Disclose Material Facts, and Notice Served on Partnership Firm Was Proper Despite Section 282(2) Argument.

23 Jan 2024

The dispute arose from reassessment proceedings under the Income Tax Act, 1961, involving a partnership firm engaged in publishing newspapers and peri...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Prima Facie Adjustment Under Section 143(1)(a) Cannot Include Provision for Doubtful Debt. The ITAT was right in holding that adjustment for provision for doubtful debt is outside the ambit of prima facie adjustment under Section 143(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

28 Jun 2011

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which deleted a prima faci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Reference in Pipeline Project Case — Limitation Period Under Section 10 of Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines Act, 1962 Starts from Date of Knowledge of Award. The Court held that the reference filed within 90 days from the date of knowledge is within limitation, setting aside the District Judge's order dismissing the reference as barred by limitation.

2 Sep 2016

The applicant, Namdeo Goma Patil, was the owner of land Gat No.68, Hissa No.8 at Mouje Ajivali, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad. An area of 600 sq. mt....

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Stop Payment Instruction Does Not Absolve Liability Under Section 138. Dishonour of Cheque Due to 'Stop Payment' Constitutes an Offence Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, When Issued for Discharge of a Legally Enforceable Debt.

11 Feb 2010

The appellant, Peter Mascarenhas, filed two criminal appeals challenging the judgments of the Sessions Court, which had set aside the conviction of th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Tutored Child Witness. High Court's Reversal of Conviction Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Foundational Facts for Section 106 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

24 Feb 2025

The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed against the acquittal of the respondent-accused, Balveer Singh, who was originally convicted by the trial court f...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)