Search Results for "online banking fraud"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "online banking fraud"

85 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 85 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Applicant in PMLA Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Money Laundering. The court held that mere association with a shell entity without direct evidence of laundering proceeds of crime does not constitute an offence under Section 3 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.

5 Dec 2025

The applicant, Khilji Mohsinahmed Mustakali, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) read wi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment for Return of Shares and Dividends in Commercial Suit — Plaintiff Stockbroker Entitled to 11,25,000 ITC Shares and Accrued Dividends After Full Satisfaction of Debt Under One Time Settlement. Court Holds That Once Debt Is Fully Satisfied, Bank Must Return All Pledged Securities and Cannot Retain Them as Collateral for Other Debts.

10 Mar 2025

The Plaintiff, Shrikant G. Mantri, a stockbroker and registered member of the Bombay Stock Exchange, filed a commercial suit against Punjab National B...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Magistrate's Order Reversing Fund Transfer in Cyber Fraud Case — Petitioner's Bank Account Used for Fraudulent Transaction Without Consent. The Court Held That a Magistrate Cannot Direct Reversal of Bank Transfers Under Section 451 CrPC as Such Transfers Are Not Property Subject to Speedy Destruction.

17 Oct 2022

The petitioners, Sri Rahul Chari (Whole-time Director of PhonePe Private Limited) and PhonePe Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 22...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Interim Injunction in Commercial Suit for Specific Performance of Share Pledge Agreement. Court holds that a prima facie case for specific performance of a contract to create a pledge is made out when the contract is clear and the plaintiff has performed its obligations.

23 Jun 2022

The appellant, World Crest Advisors LLP, filed a Commercial Suit against Catalyst Trusteeship Ltd and others seeking specific performance of a share p...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Telecom Company's Claim for Refund of Entry Fee After 2G Licences Quashed Due to Illegal Government Policy. Restitution Under Section 65 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 Denied as Quashing Did Not Render Contracts Void, and Set-Off Policy Upheld Under Article 14 of Constitution.

3 Mar 2022

The dispute involved a telecom company seeking a refund of an Entry Fee of Rs 1454.94 crores paid for 2G licences across twenty-one service areas, aft...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Arbitration Act Case Regarding Foreign Award Enforcement. Non-Signatory Parties Not Bound by Arbitration Agreement Under Alter Ego Doctrine for Enforcement Under Part II of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

10 Aug 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals concerning the recognition and enforcement of foreign awards under Part II of the Arbitration and Conci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Declaration and Injunction in Share Dispute Due to Limitation and Lack of Urgency. Plaintiff's claim for declaration of share ownership and rectification of register barred by limitation under Article 58 of Limitation Act, 1963 as cause of action arose in 1998 but suit filed in 2008.

16 Mar 2017

The plaintiff, Messer Holdings Limited, a company incorporated in British Virgin Islands, filed a suit in 2008 seeking a declaration that it is the ow...

High Court

KAHC010069912016_1

10 Nov 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

10 Nov 2016

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.

10 Nov 2016

The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)