Search Results for "offences under securities law"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "offences under securities law"

171 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 171 result(s)

High Court

High Court Quashes PMLA Proceedings Against Advocate Applicant in Money Laundering Case Involving Anil Deshmukh -- Properties Purchased in 2005-2007 Have No Nexus with Alleged 2020-2021 Proceeds of Crime

23 Feb 2026

The High Court allowed the criminal application filed by Applicant under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., quashing the process issued against him by the De...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Issues Directions in Writ Petition Challenging Legality of Criminal Proceedings. The petition was filed under Article 227 of the Constitution and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and the court directed that rule be made returnable forthwith.

9 Jun 2025

The writ petition was filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, assailing the lega...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging MPID Act Application in NSEL Scam Case — Held That MPID Act Applies to NSEL as a Financial Establishment and That Default in Repayment of Deposits Attracts Offences Under the Act.

7 Feb 2025

The judgment arises from multiple criminal appeals and interim applications filed by various parties, including directors, brokers, and financial inst...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in Real Estate Regulation Case, Upholding Authority's Jurisdiction and Pre-deposit Condition. The court affirmed that a single member of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority has jurisdiction to order refunds under Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, and the pre-deposit requirement under Section 43(5) is valid for statutory appeals.

11 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from appeals filed by promoters and real estate developers against orders of the High Court of Allahabad, which had dismissed their ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes CBI Complaint Against Senior Citizens in Bank Fraud Case — No Prima Facie Case of Cheating or Corruption. Allegations of Cheating and Forgery Under Sections 420, 468, 471 IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act Fail as Dispute is Civil in Nature and Complaint Lacks Specific Allegations.

13 Aug 2020

The petitioners, Sri Vinod Ramnani and Smt. Usha Ramnani, senior citizens, and Opto Circuit India Ltd., filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 22...

High Court

Special Court at Bombay Allows Recovery Suit Against Notified Person Under Special Court Act, 1992 — Custodian's Claim for Notified Property Rejected Due to Lack of Evidence of Tainted Transaction. The court held that the suit for recovery of Rs. 6 Crores is maintainable and the Custodian failed to prove that the property is notified property under Section 3 of the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992.

31 Jan 2019

The plaintiffs, Smt. Jyoti H. Mehta, Shri Ashwin S. Mehta, and M/s. ZEST Holdings Pvt. Ltd., filed Special Court Suit No. 1 of 2017 before the Special...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Trial by Magistrate for CBI Case Transferred from Special Judge — Reference Under Section 395(2) CrPC Maintainable for Jurisdictional Doubt. The court held that the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate has jurisdiction to try CBI Special Case No. 47/2000 involving offences under IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

4 Jun 2018

The High Court of Bombay, in its suo motu revision application, considered a reference made by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 3rd Court...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes IPC Offences in Electricity Theft Case After Compounding Under Section 135 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Dual Prosecution for Same Acts Not Permissible. The court held that once the offence under the special enactment (Electricity Act) is compounded, the IPC offences based on the same acts cannot be prosecuted, as the Electricity Act is a complete code and the compounding amounts to an election by the complainant.

9 Feb 2018

The applicant, Syed Yaqoob Syed Masood, a Taluka Agriculture Officer, filed an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No. 0273/...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Default Bail to Accused in MCOC Case for Failure to File Charge Sheet Within 90 Days. Right to Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC is Indefeasible and Cannot Be Defeated by Subsequent Filing of Charge Sheet.

5 May 2016

The petitioners were arrested in connection with Crime No.172/2015 registered at Police Station Ajni, Nagpur for offences under Sections 307, 143, 144...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Notified Person Under Special Courts Act, Holding Attached Property Cannot Be Sold in Debt Recovery Execution Without Custodian's Consent. Attachment Under Section 3(3) of Special Courts Act, 1992 Prevails Over Certificate Under Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.

17 Jan 2006

The petitioner, Ketan Parekh, was declared a notified party on 6.10.2001 under the Special Courts (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Secur...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)