Search Results for "non-appearance"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "non-appearance"

49 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 49 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petitioner's Case for Alleged Disobedience of Order — Respondent Authority Complied, Petitioner Failed to Appear Despite Notice. Disobedience Allegation Rendered Infructuous as Authority Passed Fresh Order Pursuant to Directions, and Non-Appearance of Petitioner Prevents Further Contempt Proceedings.

5 Mar 2025

The contempt petition arose from an alleged disobedience of an order dated 22.02.2024 in WP 2966 of 2024 passed by the Madras High Court. The petition...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Leave to Appeal Against Dismissal of Complaint Under Section 256 CrPC for Non-Appearance on Two Dates. The Court Held That Absence on Two Dates Does Not Constitute Persistent Absence and Set Aside the Dismissal Order, Restoring the Complaint.

11 Jul 2023

The applicant, Shineshilpi Jewellers Pvt. Ltd., filed a criminal complaint against Vimal Prakash Jain and the State of Maharashtra. The Metropolitan M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Summary Decree in Favor of Plaintiff for Recovery of Outstanding Amount for Supply of Ready-Mix Concrete. Court holds that defendant failed to appear despite service, and plaintiff established a prima facie case for summary judgment under Order XXXVII of CPC.

29 Nov 2019

The plaintiff, Skyway RMC Plants Pvt. Ltd., instituted a commercial summary suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for recovery...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Complaint Case Due to Complainant's Absence — Section 256 CrPC Mandates Acquittal Unless Adjournment is Proper. The court held that the Magistrate's discretion to adjourn must be exercised with care, and the complainant's conduct is significant; failure to appear without sufficient cause leads to acquittal.

26 Nov 2019

The appellant, Shri Champalal Kapoorchand Jain, filed a criminal complaint against M/s. Navyug Cloth Stores and its partners, Vijay Kumar Kapoorchand ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in NI Act Case Due to Complainant's Absence — Section 256 CrPC Mandates Acquittal When Complainant Fails to Appear Without Justification. The court held that the Magistrate's discretion to adjourn was not exercised as the complainant and his advocate were absent without any application for adjournment.

15 Nov 2019

The appellant, Vamsi Labs Private Limited, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) CrPC against an order of acquittal passed by the Judicial Magi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Complaint Under Section 256 Cr.P.C. for Non-Appearance on Single Day. Magistrate Must Exercise Discretion Judicially, Not Mechanically, When Complainant and Counsel Have Regularly Attended Earlier Hearings.

8 Feb 2010

The appellant, Dinesh Govindrao Mahalle, filed a criminal complaint (Case No. 3081 of 2007) against respondent no.2, Kishor Gopichandji Uike, before t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Reduces Penalty for Non-Appearance in Cheque Dishonour Case — Petitioner's Penalty Reduced from Rs.10,000 to Rs.1,000. The court held that the penalty imposed for jumping bail was harsh and reduced it, while confirming costs to the complainant and directing expeditious trial.

11 Jan 2010

The petitioner, Gautam Laxman Dongare, was the accused in a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, relating to ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Restoration Applications in Eviction Disputes Due to Failure to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance. Order IX Rule 9 CPC Requires Satisfactory Explanation for Absence, Which Was Not Provided.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to a group of civil applications filed by Lekhraj M. Solanki and Jasoda Lekhraj Solanki, the original plaintiffs, seeking restor...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Writ Petitions for Non-Prosecution in Industrial Dispute Reinstatement Case. Petitioners Failed to Appear on Date of Hearing, Leading to Dismissal of All Five Petitions Challenging Labour Court Awards.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to five connected writ petitions filed by the Secretary of Rashtra Sant Tukdoji Maharaj Technical and Education Society and Prou...

3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)