Search Results for "neglect"

495 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 495 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — No-Fault Liability Under Section 140 MV Act. Claimants entitled to interim compensation of Rs. 50,000 without proof of negligence as per Section 140 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The present appeal arises from an order dated 22.11.2017 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Akola in MACP No. 92 of 2016, rejecting the app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Sarpanch in Corruption Case. Registration of FIR and arrest under Prevention of Corruption Act constitutes disgraceful conduct under Section 39(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, justifying removal without awaiting conviction.

The petitioner, Dr. Narendra Purushottam Ingole, was elected as a Member of Gram Panchayat Wadki in June 2015 and subsequently elected as Sarpanch. A ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition for Lack of Bona Fides and Substantial Defence. Company's claim of disputed debt and pending civil suit found to be a bona fide defence against winding up under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The petitioner, M/s. Joshi Bullion Gems & Jewellery Pvt. Ltd., filed a winding up petition under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition in Company Dispute Over Back-to-Back Payment Clause. Payment Obligation Conditioned on Receipt from HAL, Not Absolute Debt, Hence Bona Fide Dispute Exists.

The petitioner, Tata Advanced Materials Ltd., filed a company petition under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking winding up of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition for Unpaid Consultancy Fees Due to Bona Fide Dispute. Disputed liability under Financial Advisor Agreement not admitted by company, held not a ground for winding up under Sections 433 and 434 of Companies Act, 1956.

The petitioner, Meghraj Capital Advisors Private Limited, filed a winding up petition under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 against Sa...