Search Results for "navy"

169 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 169 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Maintainability of Writ Petitions Against Armed Forces Tribunal Orders Under Article 226. High Court reversed Tribunal orders and granted relief; statutory appeal mechanism under Sections 30 and 31 of Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 argued to exclude writ jurisdiction.

In these connected civil appeals, the Supreme Court was confronted with the issue of maintainability of writ petitions under Article 226 of the Consti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 307 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Rajesh Kumar Yedurajsingh Bhadoriya, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, in Sessions Case No. 302/2010 for the murde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging OROP Policy Implementation for Ex-Servicemen. Periodic Revision Every Five Years Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

The dispute arose from a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the implementation of the One Rank One Pension (OROP) policy for ex...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Army Offence Jurisdiction Dispute, Restoring Sessions Court Trial. Concurrent Jurisdiction Under Section 125 of Army Act, 1950 Upheld, with Commanding Officer's Discretion Exercised Through Cooperation with Civil Investigation.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Sikkim, which upheld an order of the Sessions Judge directing that the accused, an Army personne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Navy Service Matter Due to Alternative Remedy. Petitioner, a Chief Petty Officer, Directed to Approach Armed Forces Tribunal Under Section 3(o) of Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 for Challenge to Release Order.

The petitioner, Anil Kumar, a Chief Petty Officer in the Indian Navy, challenged an order dated 26 June 2015 releasing him from service effective 31 J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Writ Petitions Challenging Industrial Tribunal's Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages. Recruitment Ban After Selection Process Completed Does Not Justify Denial of Appointment to Selected Candidates.

The Union of India and the Commander Works Engineer (Naval Works) filed two writ petitions challenging an award of the Industrial Tribunal dated 30th ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Pilots' Challenge to Command Training Selection in Air India — No Violation of Articles 14 and 16 Found. Selection based on seniority and merit was not arbitrary; employer's decision to withdraw earlier offer was justified due to operational exigencies.

The petitioners, pilots of Air India, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 30th September 2004 by wh...