Search Results for "mis-joinder"

157 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 157 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Ownership Dispute — Upholds Trial Court's Finding That Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title. Declaration of Ownership Denied as Plaintiff Could Not Establish Exclusive Title Over Suit Properties Claimed as Self-Acquired.

The case involves a First Appeal filed by the original plaintiff (since deceased, represented by his heirs) against the judgment of the Bombay City Ci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Ownership Dispute — Fails to Prove Sole Ownership and Adverse Possession. Court upholds trial court's finding that appellant failed to establish exclusive title and that suit was barred by limitation under Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a property dispute between the appellant, Namdeo Gangaram Mandalkar (since deceased, represented by his heirs), and the respondent, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in Declaration Suit Against Government — Notice Under Section 80 CPC Held Sufficient. Ex.P.7 Notice Complied with Requirements Despite Minor Defects, Lower Appellate Court's Reversal Set Aside.

The appellant-plaintiff, R. Jayaraman, filed a suit for declaration and perpetual injunction against the respondents, who are government officials and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Interim Award on Limitation in Commercial Arbitration. Winding Up Proceedings Constitute Civil Proceedings for Exclusion of Time Under Section 14 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The dispute arose from a purchase order dated 24 June 2013 placed by Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. (petitioner) on Inspira IT Products Pvt. Ltd. (res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Letters Patent Appeal in Partition Suit Due to Non-Compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC. Appellate Court's Judgment Set Aside for Failure to Frame Points for Determination and Provide Reasons.

The case arises from a Letters Patent Appeal against a judgment dated 2nd February 1988 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in F...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Letters Patent Appeal in Partition Suit Due to Non-Compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC. Appellate Court's Judgment Set Aside for Failure to Frame Points for Determination and Provide Reasons.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal arising from a judgment dated 2nd February 1988 passed in First Appeal No.4 of 1978 by a learned Single Judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.

The case involves two second appeals arising from a property dispute between the legal heirs of Madhavrao Ramchandra More (appellants in SA/66/2003 an...