Search Results for "marriage promise"

315 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 315 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Rape FIR in Social Media Dating Case — Consensual Relationship Not Rape. Section 64 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 does not apply where sexual intercourse was based on a false promise of marriage but the promise was not the sole basis for consent.

The petitioner, Mr. Sampras Anthony, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Framing of Charges in Rape Case Based on False Promise of Marriage and Coercion. Consent Obtained Under Misconception of Fact or Fear of Defamation is Vitiated and Constitutes Rape Under Section 375 IPC.

The case arises from a criminal appeal by special leave against the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court dismissing the appellant's revision agai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Discharge of Accused in Cheating and Rape Case Due to Consensual Relationship and Lack of Deception from Inception. Promise to Marry Not Fulfilled Does Not Constitute Rape or Cheating When Relationship Was Consensual and Prosecutrix Was Aware of Accused's Marital Status.

The petitioner, Siddharth Narendra Banthia, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 3rd Septem...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Rape Case Due to Consensual Relationship Between Engaged Couple. Court holds that sexual intercourse between engaged parties with promise of marriage does not constitute rape under Section 376 IPC if consent is voluntary and not induced by false promise.

The applicant, Navneet Bangalkar, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing of FIR No.057...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Compromise Between Spouses. Matrimonial Dispute Settled Amicably Leads to Termination of Criminal Proceedings Under Section 482 CrPC.

The judgment pertains to two criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No. 123 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice. Accused Acquitted as Complainant Failed to Prove Service of Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The judgment pertains to three criminal applications filed by the applicants seeking quashing of criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotia...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheating Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Deception. Conviction under Section 417 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that accused made false promise with intent to deceive complainant.

The appellant, Shankar, was convicted by the I Additional Sessions Judge, Dakshina Kannada, Mangalore, in S.C. No. 78/2005 for the offence punishable ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Cheating in Promise-to-Marry Case — Acquittal for Rape Stands. Accused convicted under Section 417 IPC for inducing sexual intercourse on false promise of marriage, but acquitted of rape as consent was not vitiated.

The appellant, Lahanu Waman Kharde, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangamner, for the offence punishable under Section 417 of the Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Regulation of Marriage Bureaus Run by Lawyers and Notaries in Public Interest Litigation. The court held that marriage bureaus run by lawyers and notaries require regulation to prevent exploitation and professional misconduct under the Advocates Act, 1961 and Notaries Act, 1952.

The petitioner, Majlis Manch, a registered public trust and NGO, filed a public interest litigation before the Bombay High Court alleging that several...