Search Results for "mandatory satisfaction"

881 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 881 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Damages Suit. Section 125 of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 does not bar civil suit for damages against co-operative society and its employees for acts outside the scope of the Act.

The petitioner, defendant No.3 (Branch Manager of Karnataka State Co-operative Consumer's Federation Ltd.), filed a Civil Revision Petition under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Awards Compensation for Illegal Arrest in Electricity Theft Case Despite Full Payment of Dues. Petitioner's Arrest Violated Article 21 as Police Failed to Verify Payment from Complainant Before Arrest Under Sections 135 and 150 of Indian Electricity Act, 1886.

The petitioner, Alex Isaac, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction for legal action against persons responsible for his illegal arrest and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Arbitration Appointment Dispute — Pre-Amendment Act Applies; No Claim Certificate Does Not Bar Arbitration; Mutually Agreed Procedure Must Be Respected

The Supreme Court heard a batch of appeals arising from orders of the Rajasthan High Court appointing independent arbitrators under Section 11(6) of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL's Application to Declare Arbitral Award Satisfied as Vexatious and Dilatory. Unilateral Deposit of Disputed Amount Without Decree-Holder's Consent Does Not Discharge Judgment-Debtor Under Section 31 CPC.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), the unsuccessful respondent in an ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Notice Under Section 111 CrPC for Non-Application of Mind and Vague Allegations — Use of Printed Proforma Without Recording Reasons Renders Notice Invalid

The petitioner, Ruben Franco, challenged a notice dated 6/01/2017 issued under Section 111 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 by the Deputy Colle...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bayer's Challenge to Compulsory License for Nexavar Under Section 84 of Patents Act, 1970. Court Holds That Patentee's Import of Drug at High Price Does Not Satisfy Reasonable Requirements of Public or Constitute Working of Invention in India.

The petitioner, Bayer Corporation, a US-based pharmaceutical company, held a patent for the drug Sorafenib Tosylate, sold under the brand name Nexavar...