Search Results for "lease modification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "lease modification"

401 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 401 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses IDBI Bank's Appeal Against KIADB's Cancellation of Land Allotment for Non-Compliance with Allotment Conditions. The Court held that the allotment letter did not create any vested right in the appellant and that the KIADB was justified in cancelling the allotment due to the appellant's failure to pay the balance consideration and execute the lease-cum-sale agreement within the stipulated time.

28 Apr 2026

The appellant, IDBI Bank Limited, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the communication dated 20.12.2022 issued by th...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows SIPCOT's Appeal in Sub-Leasing Dispute — Demand for Sub-Leasing Charges Upheld. Lease Agreement Clause 2(vii) Prohibiting Sub-Leasing Without Consent and Requiring Payment of Charges is Valid and Enforceable.

6 Feb 2026

The case involves two writ appeals filed by State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Limited (SIPCOT) against orders of a learned Single J...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner to Retain Allotment Despite Delay in Payment of Lease Premium — Condonation of Delay Granted. Petitioner's failure to pay installments on time due to COVID-19 pandemic condoned, allotment restored on payment of interest and DPC.

19 Apr 2023

The petitioner, Narayani Trexim Pvt. Ltd., participated in a tender floated by CIDCO for lease of a plot in Sector 18, Vashi, Navi Mumbai. It was the ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession (Amendment) Rules, 2016 — Time Limit for Obtaining Environmental Clearance Upheld. Rule 8-B requiring quarry lease holders to obtain environmental clearance within 24 months from commencement of amendment rules is held to be reasonable and not violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution.

12 Mar 2021

The petitioners, holders of quarry leases for minor minerals, challenged the validity of Rule 8-B of the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession (Amendment...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Injunction in Property Dispute — Prima Facie Case Established for Temporary Injunction. The court set aside the trial court's order and remanded for fresh consideration of the injunction application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

4 Mar 2020

The appellant, M/s Lumbini Gardens Limited, filed a suit for permanent injunction to restrain the respondents (State of Karnataka and others) from unl...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Decides Surviving Issue on Interpretation of Government Notification in Land Reservation Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Lessee Entitled to Non-Cash Compensation Under 2004 Notification for Release of Reserved Land for Development.

16 Aug 2018

The writ petition was filed by Mafatlal Industries Limited and its officer seeking directions to enforce a Government Notification dated 10-02-2004 th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Under Section 37(1)(b) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Sets Aside Trial Court Order Dismissing Section 9 Application for Injunction. Court holds that existence of arbitration agreement and prima facie case for interim relief must be considered at the stage of Section 9 application, and the trial court erred in dismissing the application without considering the merits.

2 Aug 2017

The appellant, M/s Equestrain Centre for Excellence, filed an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking an in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Specific Performance Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's discretion to deny specific performance and award damages instead, finding no grounds for interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

27 Aug 2014

The petitioner, Rolta India Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 8th December, 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging CIDCO's Refusal to Grant Lease in Favour of Air India Employees' Cooperative Housing Society. Transfer of Land Allotted to Air India for Staff Quarters Requires Prior Permission of CIDCO Under New Bombay Disposal of Lands Regulations 1975.

24 Jul 2012

The petitioners, a cooperative housing society formed by employees of Air India, sought a writ of mandamus directing CIDCO to grant a lease in their f...

High Court

Bombay High Court pronounces judgment on Letters Patent appeals in oppression and mismanagement case under Companies Act, 1956 — dispute over diversion of Contship agency business. The Court examined whether directors' diversion of business opportunity amounted to oppression and breach of fiduciary duty under Sections 397, 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 and Section 88 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882.

31 Mar 2006

The appeals arose from a dispute between the Puri Group and the Sippy Group, both holding equal shares and equal directorships in two private Indian s...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)