Search Results for "land surrender"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "land surrender"

771 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 771 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA in Favor of Housing Societies. The Court held that the Competent Authority has jurisdiction to grant deemed conveyance under Section 11 of MOFA even if the developer retains development rights over part of the land.

18 Jun 2026

The Petitioner-Developer, Kiran Builders Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 15 May 2017 passed by the District Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Municipal Corporation's Mandamus for Land Acquisition Due to Lapsed Reservation and Financial Incapacity. Reservation under Development Plan Lapsed Under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966, and Acquisition Not Mandated as Corporation Lacked Funds Under RFCTLARR Act, 2013.

14 Feb 2022

The dispute involved a land reservation under the Kolhapur development plan sanctioned in 1999 for public purposes like parking and garden. The landow...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Declaration of Lapsed Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act for Failure to Acquire Land Within Statutory Period. Purchase Notice Served Under Section 127(1) of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Not Followed by Acquisition Within Two Years, Resulting in Deemed Lapsing of Reservation.

27 Jan 2022

The petitioner, Shree Vinayak Builders & Developers, owned land admeasuring 6377.12 Sq.Mts. in Nagpur, which was reserved for a 24-meter wide DP Road ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Voluntary Agreement Under Section 7(2) of Tamil Nadu Act Binds Parties, Cannot Seek Higher Compensation Under Section 12. The Court held that a party to a concluded statutory contract cannot take refuge under other provisions of the same Act to seek further relief.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves appeals by the Government of Tamil Nadu against a judgment of the Madras High Court which allowed the respondents (landowners) to se...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Urban Improvement Trust's Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Acquisition Proceedings Upheld Despite Delay and Compensation Disputes. Notification under Section 52(1) of Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959 Valid; Compensation Determined and Paid Lawfully.

10 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Urban Improvement Trust against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court which had quashed the land...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes ULC Act Demand for Entire Land Area Including Vacant Land — Demand Must Be Limited to Built-Up Area Only. The court held that under the repealed Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, a demand for payment cannot include vacant land as per the Section 20 Exemption Order Schedule.

9 Aug 2023

The petitioners challenged a demand of Rs 6,09,66,477 raised by the District Collector and Competent Authority under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regul...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Land Acquisition for Panshet Dam Rehabilitation — Land Acquisition Act Prevails Over Resettlement Act in Absence of Section 11(1) Declaration. The court held that the Full Bench decision in Ganpat Balwant Pawar settles that the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 governs acquisitions for rehabilitation unless a declaration under Section 11(1) of the Maharashtra Resettlement of Project Displaced Persons Act, 1976 is made.

7 Mar 2016

The petitioners, legal heirs of deceased Sahebrao Gulabrao Dhamale, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MHADA's Surplus Area Demand in Redevelopment — Condition 22 of NOC Valid Under MHAD Act. Petitioners' Challenge to Communication Dated 6 July 2007 and Appellate Order Rejected.

19 Mar 2015

The petitioners, owners of a property admeasuring about 546 sq. mtrs. in Mumbai, sought redevelopment and obtained a No Objection Certificate (NOC) fr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Premium Demand on Entire Land in ULC Repeal Case — Demand Must Be Limited to Vacant Land Only. The Court held that under the repealed Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, a premium demand for the entire land including built-up area is impermissible; only vacant land as per the exemption order can be subject to premium.

9 Aug 2023

The Petitioner, Modern Paints, a partnership firm, acquired land in Oshiwara, Mumbai, under a conveyance dated 12 June 1975. On 1 August 1977, it file...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in Land Reforms Act Case — Tenancy Rights Not Established Due to Lack of Evidence of Cultivation. Land Tribunal's Order Based on Surrender Deemed Invalid as Surrender by Non-Tenant Has No Legal Effect Under Section 48-A of Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

17 Nov 2022

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellants challenging the order of th...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)