Search Results for "invalid notification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "invalid notification"

1300 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1300 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Landowner's Compensation in Land Acquisition Case Under Composite Notification. Absence of Separate Section 4(1) Notification Not Fatal When Landowner Consented and Government Had Taken Possession.

11 Sep 1968

The dispute arose from the acquisition of land belonging to Vijay Cotton & Oil Mills Ltd. by the State of Gujarat. In 1949, the Government took posses...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Forest Development Tax Notification. Petitioners Alleged Notification Ultra Vires Article 246 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, Seeking to Quash Demand Notices.

3 Dec 2015

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, corporations, and individuals, including National ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment of Co-operative Housing Society in CRZ-II Area Without Prior CRZ Clearance Under 2011 Notification — Stop Work Notice Quashed. The court held that para 8(iii) of the CRZ Notification 2011 permits redevelopment of existing authorized buildings in CRZ-II areas without prior CRZ clearance, and the stop work notice issued by MCZMA was invalid.

3 Sep 2014

The petitioner, Sea Green Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., is the lessee of land admeasuring approximately 1,672 sq. mtrs. in Worli, Mumbai, which f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications for Delay in Section 6 Declaration. Section 6 Declaration Issued Beyond One Year from Last Publication of Section 4 Notification Invalidates Acquisition Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

12 Dec 2013

The petitioners, Riva Resorts Pvt. Ltd. and its director Vishwanath Balaram Naik Palyekar, challenged the notifications issued under Sections 4 and 6 ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Constitutional Validity of Forest Development Tax Notification and Demands. Petitioners Challenge vires of Karnataka Forest Act section 98A and Notification under Forest Conservation Act.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases Under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963; Constitutional Validity of Section 98A and Notification Examined. The petitioners contended that the notification dated 16.08.2008 and demand of forest development tax from holders of mining leases in forest areas were repugnant to the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and ultra vires the State's legislative competence.

3 Dec 2015

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by various entities inc...

High Court

KAHC020032022013_1

30 Apr 2014

...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Challenge to Land Acquisition for Kilambakkam Sky Walk Project; Holds District Gazette Publication Valid Under RFCTLARR Act, 2013. District Collector's Dual Role as Collector and Appropriate Government Upheld, and Writ Maintainable Despite Passing of Award.

3 Mar 2025

The petitioners, owners of land in Kilambakkam Village, Chengelpet District, challenged the acquisition of their property for the construction of a sk...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds State's Notifications in Urban Development Case Due to Erroneous High Court Findings on Mala Fides and Statutory Interpretation. Notifications Under Punjab Scheduled Roads and Controlled Areas Restriction of Unregulated Development Act, 1963 and Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975 Were Valid as High Court's Reliance on Definition of 'Colony' and Insufficient Mala Fides Findings Were Legally Unsustainable.

16 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from the State of Haryana and Town Planning Authorities appealing against a High Court judgment that set aside two notifications: on...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Industrial Development — Petitioners Failed to Show Violation of Statutory Provisions. The Court held that the acquisition under the KIAD Act, 1966 was valid and the petitioners were not entitled to higher compensation as they had already received enhanced compensation under a consent award.

3 Jun 2019

The petitioners, Smt. Kempamma and others, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)