Search Results for "interest pendente lite"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "interest pendente lite"

320 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 320 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Developer's Appeals in Consumer Disputes Over Delayed Possession — Compensation Modified to 9% Interest Per Annum in Line with Consent Orders. The Court held that the developer is entitled to a three-year completion period and compensation for delay shall be at a uniform rate of 9% per annum, not the higher rates awarded by the NCDRC.

10 May 2019

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of civil appeals arising from orders of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) concerning d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL's Application to Declare Arbitral Award Satisfied as Vexatious and Dilatory. Unilateral Deposit of Disputed Amount Without Decree-Holder's Consent Does Not Discharge Judgment-Debtor Under Section 31 CPC.

13 Mar 2018

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), the unsuccessful respondent in an ar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows ICICI Bank's Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside Arbitral Award on Claims for Loss of Profit and Interest on Mobilization Advance. The court held that the arbitrator cannot award interest on an interest-free mobilization advance and cannot award loss of profit without evidence of actual loss.

30 Mar 2016

The petitioner, ICICI Bank Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dat...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Case — Doctrine of Lis Pendens Applied to Protect Plaintiff's Rights Despite Concurrent Findings of Lower Courts. The Court held that an alienation made during the pendency of a suit is void against the decree-holder under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and that the First Appellate Court could not record a finding on fraud and collusion without cross-objections by the defendants under Order 41 Rule 22 CPC.

14 Oct 2024

The dispute arose from an agreement to sell dated 17.08.1990 executed by defendant no. 1 (Janraj Singh) in favour of the plaintiff (Daljit Singh) for ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition by Government Undertaking Challenging Execution Court Order on Interest Calculation in Arbitral Award Enforcement. Court upholds execution court's acceptance of decree holder's memo of calculation, rejecting judgment debtor's objections regarding interest computation under Section 34 of CPC.

4 Apr 2017

The petitioners, Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Ltd. and its Executive Engineer, a Government of Karnataka undertaking, had engaged the respondent, M/s. Sh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging TDS Deduction on Interest Component of Motor Accident Compensation. Interest on compensation under Motor Vehicles Act is not 'income' and TDS cannot be deducted under Income Tax Act.

8 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Balkrishna Mhaske, through his wife Latabai, filed a writ petition challenging the deduction of Tax at Source (TDS) on the interest co...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Decree Holder's Legal Representatives in Partition Execution Dispute — Remand for Fresh Consideration Upheld. Pendente lite transferee held entitled to maintain application under Order XXI Rule 99 CPC to challenge execution as time-barred under Article 136 of Limitation Act, 1963.

17 Oct 2024

The dispute arises from a partition suit (O.S.No.38 of 1956) filed by Padmakshy before the Sub Court, Parur, seeking partition and separate possession...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Holds That Purchaser of Property During Pendency of Suit Is Bound by Doctrine of Lis Pendens Under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and That Will Deed Must Be Proved in Accordance with Law. The court held that the appellant, who purchased the property during the pendency of the suit, is bound by the decree, and the will deed was not duly proved as attesting witnesses were not examined.

18 Nov 2019

The case involves a second appeal arising from a partition suit. The original plaintiffs, Shivaji and Kamlabai, claimed a 1/3rd share in the propertie...

High Court

High Court Allows Impleadment Application in Property Appeal Despite 14-Year Delay. Application under Order XXII Rule 10 read with Order I Rule 10 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 granted as no time limit prescribed for devolution of interest, and impleadment avoids abatement without prejudice to appellants.

5 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a suit for possession filed in 1974, which was decreed in favor of the plaintiffs in 2011. The defendants appealed, and during ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Restrains Subsequent Purchaser from Alienating Property During Pendency of Suit. Doctrine of lis pendens under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 applies to subsequent purchaser who bought property during pendency of suit for specific performance.

9 Oct 2013

The appellant, M/s. Rehab Housing Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 16 April 2006 against the original o...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)