Search Results for "inculpatory part"

123 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 123 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Acquittal of Accused Under Section 302 IPC Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Goa appealed against the acquittal of Mohan Biswal for the murder of an unknown person under Section 302 IPC. The prosecution case was th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows State Appeal Against Acquittal in Theft and Public Property Damage Case — Defective Investigation Cannot Be Sole Ground for Acquittal. Trial Court Must Appreciate Evidence Dehors Investigation Defects to Determine if Case is Made Out Against Accused.

The State of Goa appealed against the acquittal of Dadasaheb Rane, a market inspector of Bicholim Municipal Council (BMC), who was charged with theft ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 120-B read with Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove conspiracy and murder beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, original accused nos. 1 to 3, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bombay, for offences under Section 120-B simplicitor, S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused for Murder with Swords, Acquits Third Accused of All Charges. Common intention under Section 34 IPC established for fatal attack following trivial altercation.

The judgment arises from two connected appeals: Criminal Appeal No. 1515 of 2013 filed by original accused Nos. 1 and 2 (Parmar Chhaganbhai Bhojabhai ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Appeals from Conviction of Accused in Murder and Rioting Case. Court Considers Reliability of Eyewitnesses and Non-Explanation of Injuries on Accused as Key Legal Issues.

The judgment under analysis pertains to two criminal appeals filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, arising from a common judgment and o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inadmissible Confession and Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ku. Panchashila Uttam Thorat, was convicted by the II Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Washim in Sessions Trial No. 98/2004 for the mur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Uncorroborated Trap Proceedings. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Mahalingappa, a retired Junior Engineer of KPTCL, was convicted by the Special Judge and Principal Sessions Judge, Bidar, in Special Ca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 313 CrPC -- Conviction Under Section 302/34 IPC Overturned

The Supreme Court heard appeals by three appellants convicted for murder under Section 302/34 IPC, along with other charges, and sentenced to life imp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Appeal Against Conviction for Murder Under Sections 302, 201 r/w 34 IPC, Focusing on Deficiencies in Circumstantial Evidence and Procedural Lapses

The appeal arose from a conviction for murder and destruction of evidence under Sections 302 and 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 18...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in CBI Corruption Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Invalid Sanction. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to two criminal appeals filed by Vilas Vasudev Kunkolienkar (A1) and his wife Vijayshree Vilas Kunkolienkar (A3) challenging their c...