Search Results for "inconsistent pleas"

164 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 164 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Possession Suit — Concurrent Findings on Ownership and Limitation Upheld. Adverse Possession Plea Fails as Defendant Failed to Prove Hostile Possession for Statutory Period.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendant, Mrs. Anjanabai Rajaram Gore, challenging the concurrent judgments and decrees of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Plaintiff's Claim for Possession in Property Dispute Based on Title and Rejects Adverse Possession Defense. Licensee's Possession Cannot Be Converted into Adverse Possession Without Clear Evidence of Ouster.

The dispute pertained to a suit property in Bangalore. The original plaintiff, A. Krishnappa, claimed ownership of the property as joint family proper...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Letters Patent Appeal against decree for possession and mesne profits dismissed as no substantial question of law or perversity found in concurrent findings of fact.

The present Letters Patent Appeal arises from a judgment and decree passed by a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in First Appeal No. 133/1976, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute. Court Upholds Arbitral Tribunal's Findings of Fact and Rejects Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns multiple arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral awa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Defendant's Second Appeal in Possession Suit, Upholding Plaintiff's Title and Rejecting Adverse Possession Claim. Defendant's possession held permissive, not hostile; civil court jurisdiction not barred under Section 91 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

The plaintiff, Rajesh Parasram Shahu, filed Regular Civil Suit No. 1778/1993 for possession of Plot No. 88 at Khasra No.4/5, Gat No.78, admeasuring 80...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Acquittal Set Aside Due to Inconsistent Defence and Failure to Rebut Presumption. Accused Convicted Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for Dishonour of Cheque Issued for Friendly Loan.

The appellant, Ramdas Anant Naik, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against respondent Jacob Fernandes, alle...