Search Results for "harbouring"

102 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 102 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Assault Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 323 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish the role of each accused in the alleged assault on the deceased Police Patil.

The case pertains to an appeal against conviction under Section 323 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The appellants, Rambhau Baban...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. The court upheld the acquittal of four accused under Section 302 read with 34 IPC as the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of four accused (Murlidhar Baburao Chavan, Prakash Murlidhar Chavan, Rajendra Murlidhar Chavan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Rape Case Due to Unreliable Prosecutrix Testimony. Inconsistencies in Evidence and Lack of Corroboration Under Sections 376 and 506 IPC Lead to Upholding of Acquittal.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Sanjay Rangrao Choukikar (respondent-accused) for offences under Sections 376 (rape) and 50...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ranjit S Kadam, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of Shital, a neighbor, and sentenced to l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 324, 341 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 31st December 1994 passed by the Learned Joint District Judge and Additi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Discharge of Accused from MCOC Act Offences for Lack of Sanction and Prima Facie Case. The court held that the sanction under Section 23(1)(a) of MCOC Act was invalid and the allegations did not constitute 'organised crime' under Section 2(1)(e) of the Act.

The appellants, original accused nos.1 to 6 in MCOC Special Case No.5 of 2016 pending before the Special Judge (under the MCOC Act), Pune, filed an ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Forest Guard in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Khudaram Kshirsagar, a Forest Guard, who was charged under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in SC/ST Atrocity Case Due to Civil Dispute and Lack of Public View Element. Alleged Caste-Based Insult Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Not Made Out as Incident Occurred in Private Setting.

The applicants, including the Headmaster of Jagdamba Vidyalaya run by Saraswati Mata Vidya Prasarak Mandal, sought quashing of FIR No. 3019/11 registe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition and Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Non-Consideration of Bail Order and Retraction of Statements Violates Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Ganesh Maharudra Desai, challenged the detention order dated 6/8/2009 passed under Section 3(1) of the Conservation...