Search Results for "fiscal purposes"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "fiscal purposes"

282 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 282 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Coconut Oil Classification Dispute — Holds Pure Coconut Oil in Small Packings Classifiable as Hair Oil Under Heading 3305. The Court applied Section Note 2 and Chapter Note 3 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, ruling that packaging for retail sale as hair oil overrides classification as edible oil under Heading 1513.

13 Dec 2024

The case involved appeals by the Revenue (Commissioner of Central Excise) against M/s. Madhan Agro Industries (India) Private Ltd. concerning the clas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application of Lessor in Rent Control Exclusion Case. Company That Lost Rent Control Protection Due to High Paid-Up Share Capital Cannot Regain It by Subsequent Reduction.

4 Oct 2024

The case involves a dispute between M/s. Depe Global Shipping Agencies Pvt. Ltd. (Plaintiff/Lessor) and M/s. Mather and Platt (India) Ltd. (Defendant/...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Disqualifying Related Parties of Corporate Debtors from Submitting Resolution Plans. The Court holds that the disqualification under Section 29A(c) applies to persons acting jointly or in concert with a disqualified person, and that the provision is not retrospective in operation.

3 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment on the interpretation and validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty for Excavation of Ordinary Earth Without Authorization Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code — Petitioner Had Valid Development Permission and No Mining Intent. Excavation of ordinary earth as part of construction project does not attract royalty or penalty under Section 48(7) of MLRC if done under valid development permission.

8 Mar 2024

The petitioner, AIGP Developers (Pune) Private Limited, challenged an order dated 29 June 2023 passed by the Tehsildar, Haveli (Pune), under Section 4...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Orders in SARFAESI Act Recovery Case, Reiterates Limited Scope of Article 226 in Private Financial Disputes. The Court held that the High Court cannot entertain writ petitions challenging SARFAESI Act actions when an alternative remedy under Section 17 of the Act is available, and the interim arrangement by the Supreme Court did not confer jurisdiction to decide merits after DRT became functional.

17 Apr 2023

The case involves appeals by a lender bank against orders of the Kerala High Court that entertained writ petitions filed by borrowers (respondents) ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in MVAT Case — Tribunal's Liberal Interpretation of Section 23(5) Upheld for Concessional Tax Rate on C Forms. The court held that the Tribunal was justified in allowing the respondent's claim for concessional rate of tax under Section 23(5) of the MVAT Act, 2002, even though the claim was not part of the original assessment order.

8 Sep 2022

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal under Section 27 of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (MVAT Act) challenging the judgment of the Maha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds SEBI's Power to Regulate Fee Structure of Investment Advisors — Amendment Regulations and Circular Held Valid. Regulation 15A of SEBI (Investment Advisors) (Amendment) Regulations, 2020 and Circular dated 23.09.2020 are within SEBI's delegated legislative competence and do not violate Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

18 Jun 2021

The petitioner, Purnartha Investment Advisers Private Limited, challenged the constitutional validity of Regulation 3(XII) of the Securities and Excha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Challenge to Property Tax Demands on Mobile Towers in Part. Conservancy Tax, Penalty, and Shasti on Illegal Constructions Quashed as Invalid Under Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act.

18 Apr 2017

The petitioners, Chennai Network Infrastructure Ltd. and another, carry on business of providing infrastructure services including installation and ma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of MVAT Provisions on Input Tax Credit Reversal for Capital Goods Sold as Scrap. Section 48(5) of MVAT Act, 2002 and Rule 58A of MVAT Rules, 2005 held intra vires the Constitution and not ultra vires the parent Act.

10 Jun 2013

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by various companies challenging the constitutional validity of Section 48(5) of the Maharashtra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Rules Against Export Tax Exemption for Helium Gas Supplied to ONGC at Mumbai High. Sales to ONGC at Mumbai High Not Exports Under Section 5(1) Central Sales Tax Act as Mumbai High Is Not a Foreign Destination.

9 Jan 2012

The case involves a sales tax reference under Section 61(4) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from a decision of the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tr...

3 4 5 6 7

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)